The Comparison of the Community Features between the Constructed Wetland and the Natural Wetland in Nansi Lake

Article Preview

Abstract:

Thirteen typical plant communities were investigated in Xinxuehe constructed wetland restored for five years and in Gaolou natural wetland restored naturally for eight years. Both wetlands are located in Nansi Lake area. The species composition, coverage, aboveground biomass and biodiversity indices were compared between the communities from the constructed wetland and the natural wetland. The results showed that the constructed wetland and the natural wetland had similar emergent species and typical species of their own, however neither coverage nor aboveground biomass showed significant differences. In the meanwhile, we found that the biodiversity of natural wetland is relatively higher than the constructed wetland. For the wetland restoration and the water quality quick improving, it is suitable to use artificial ways to promote the restoration of wetlands which converted from the farmland in Nansi Lake area; in the other hand, the natural wetland restoration is more valuable for the biodiversity conservation in the long run.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

5238-5243

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z.F. Yang and B. Chen: Ecological Modeling, 222(2011):221-223.

Google Scholar

[2] N. Huang, D.W. Liu and Z.M. Wang: Scientia Geographica Sinica, 29 (2009): 874-879. [In Chinese]

Google Scholar

[3] L. Liu, J. Liu, Y.T. Wang and R.Q. Wang: Int. J. Environ. Res. 5(2011):787-796.

Google Scholar

[4] M.P. Vécrin, R.V. Diggelen and F. Grévilliot: Applied vegetation science, 5(2002):263-270.

Google Scholar

[5] J.Vymazal: Ecological Engineering, 35(2009): 1-17.

Google Scholar

[6] V. Gasiunas, Z. Strusevicius and M.S. Struseviciene: Journal of environmental science and health Part A Toxichazardous substances environmental engineering, 40 (2005):1467-1478.

DOI: 10.1081/ese-200055889

Google Scholar

[7] J. Vymazal: Journal of environmental science and health Part A Toxichazardous substances environmental engineering, 40(2005): 1369-1379.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Gorra , M. Coci and R. Ambrosoli: Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103(2007): 1442-1452.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Vymazal: Hydrobiologia, 674(2011):133-156.

Google Scholar

[10] J.S. Thullen, J.J. Sartoris and S.M. Nelson: Ecological Engineering, 25(2005):583-593.

Google Scholar

[11] E.F. Liu, W. Hou, L. Cui, J.C. Deng and L.Y. Yang: Wetland science, 7(2009):261-265. [In Chinese]

Google Scholar

[12] S.L. Peng and D.X. Wang:Acta Bot. Boreal. Occident . Sin., 29(2009): 2301- 2311.

Google Scholar

[13] D. De Steven, R.R. Sharitz and J.H. Singer: Restoration Ecology, 14 (2006):452-460.

Google Scholar

[14] M.A. Huston, L.W. Aarssen and M.P. Austin: Science, 289(2000): 1255.

Google Scholar

[15] B.J. Cardinale, J.P. Wright, M.W. Cadotte: PNAS, 104(2007): 18123–18128.

Google Scholar