The Evaluation of Water Security: Research Methods of Water Resources Carrying Capacity

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the growth of population, water security has become the worldwide problem combined with severe environment pollution, quick economic development and irrational water allocation. Based on sustainable development, Water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) driven from physics originally has been proposed to solve it. The measurement of WRCC can tell decision-makers that how much population the water resource can feed, what degree water resources can support the economic and so on. Because the decision-makers can make adaptive decisions based on the correct evaluation of WRCC, the ways of the assessment of WRCC are very important. This paper focuses on how to measure WRCC by selecting three typical methods, fuzzy model of comprehensive evaluation, multiple criteria analysis (MCA) and system dynamics (SD) methods. The characteristics of these methods are good at solving the multi-objective and complicated problem in common which is the trait of WRCC. The differences of them are the specific process of analysis and evaluation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

918-921

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. J. Vorosmarty, Global water assessment and potential contributions from Earth Systems Science," Aquatic Sciences, vol. 64, pp.328-351, 2002.

DOI: 10.1007/pl00012590

Google Scholar

[2] P. H. Nienhuis and R. Leuven, River restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergism?, Hydrobiologia, vol. 444, pp.85-99, Feb 2001.

Google Scholar

[3] H. T. C. van Stokkom, A. J. M. Smits, and R. Leuven, Flood defense in the Netherlands - A new era, a new approach, Water International, vol. 30, pp.76-87, Mar 2005.

DOI: 10.1080/02508060508691839

Google Scholar

[4] G. E. Petts, J. Nestler, and R. Kennedy, Advancing science for water resources management, Hydrobiologia, vol. 565, pp.277-288, Jul 2006.

DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1919-1

Google Scholar

[5] M. J. Bender and S. P. Simonovic, A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 115, pp.35-44, Oct 2000.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(99)00025-1

Google Scholar

[6] D. Butler, A. Kokkalidou, and C. K. Makropoulos, Supporting the siting of new urban developments for integrated urban water resource management, in Integrated Urban Water Resources Management, P. Hlavinek, T. Kukharchyk, J. Marsalek, and I. Mahrikova, Eds., ed, 2006, pp.19-34.

DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4685-5_3

Google Scholar

[7] R. M. Faye, S. Sawadogo, C. Lishou, and F. Mora-Camino, Long-term fuzzy management of water resource systems, Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 137, pp.459-475, May 2003.

DOI: 10.1016/s0096-3003(02)00151-0

Google Scholar

[8] R. M. Faye, S. Sawadogo, and F. Mora-Camino, Flexible management of water resource systems, Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 167, pp.516-527, Aug 2005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.07.017

Google Scholar

[9] I. El-Baroudy and S. P. Simonovic, Fuzzy criteria for the evaluation of water resource systems performance, Water Resources Research, vol. 40, Oct 2004.

DOI: 10.1029/2003wr002828

Google Scholar

[10] S. Hajkowicz and K. Collins, A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management, Water Resources Management, vol. 21, pp.1553-1566, Sep 2007.

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5

Google Scholar

[11] W. J. de Lange and T. E. Kleynhans, Strategic decision-making for water resource management in semi-arid metropolitan and rural areas, in Sustainable Irrigation Management, Technologies and Policies. vol. 96, G. Lorenzini and C. A. Brebbia, Eds., ed, 2006, pp.277-288.

DOI: 10.2495/si060271

Google Scholar

[12] K. M. Hyde, H. R. Maier, and C. B. Colby, A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 77, pp.278-290, Dec 2005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.011

Google Scholar

[13] T. Prato and G. Herath, Multiple-criteria decision analysis for integrated catchment management, Ecological Economics, vol. 63, pp.627-632, Aug 2007.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.003

Google Scholar

[14] S. Hajkowicz and A. Higgins, Comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 184, pp.255-265, Jan 2008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.045

Google Scholar

[15] X. H. Zhang, H. W. Zhang, B. Chen, G. Q. Chen, and X. H. Zhao, Water resources planning based on complex system dynamics: A case study of Tianjin city, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 13, pp.2328-2336, Dec 2008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.05.031

Google Scholar

[16] K. D. W. Nandalal and S. P. Simonovic, Resolving conflicts in water sharing: A systemic approach, Water Resources Research, vol. 39, Dec 2003.

DOI: 10.1029/2003wr002172

Google Scholar

[17] T. L. Huang, L. Mei, and X. C. C. Wang, System dynamics model and its application to municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse for the arid and water-deficient area in western China, 2005.

Google Scholar