Sulfur Content Reduction and Iron Grade Improvement of V-Ti Magnetite Concentrate by Combining Reverse Flotation and Magnetic Separation

Article Preview

Abstract:

For low-grade iron ore, smelting costs and resource wastage will be increased. Product quality of such ore is affected adversely by an excessive amount of sulfur. This also causes environmental pollution. In accordance with the vanadium-titanium (V-Ti) magnetite concentrate properties with low iron grade and high sulfur content, the joint process of magnetic separation and flotation was carried out. Magnetic separation was conducted to increase the iron grade, while reverse flotation was used to reduce sulfur content. Results show that the feeding mainly contains titanomagnetite, hematite, and pyrite. The sulfur was primarily found in pyrite. The separation effect was influenced by the grinding fineness, magnetic intensity, collector type and dosage, and pH value. At a grinding fineness of −45 μm accounting for 87%, most of the iron minerals exhibited monomer dissociation. An open-circuit experiment was carried out under the best conditions of magnetic intensity, as well as collector and modifier dosage. Good experimental results were obtained as follows: the iron grade increased to 57.17%, iron recovery was 89.94%, sulfur content decreased from 0.66% to 0.26%, reverse flotation of sulfur foam concentrate contained almost 15.68% sulfur, the upgrade ratio was about 23, and the cobalt in the sulfur concentrate was enriched 20-fold. A method for improving the comprehensive utilization level and effect of mineral resources is provided in this study.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

1115-1123

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F.X. Wu, X.H Li, Z.X. Wang, L. Wu, H.J. Guo, X.H. Xiong, X.P. Zhang and X.J. Wang: Int. J. Miner. Process. Vol. 98 (2011), p.106

Google Scholar

[2] D.S. Chen, B. Song, L.N. Wang, T. Qi, Y. Wang and W.J. Wang: Miner. Eng. Vol. 24 (2011), p.864

Google Scholar

[3] X.H. Liu, G.S. Gai, Y.F. Yang, Z.H. Sui, L. Li and J.X. Fu: J. CUMT. Vol. 18 (2008), p.275

Google Scholar

[4] C. Li, B. Liang, L.H. Guo and Z.B. Wu: Miner. Eng. Vol. 19 (2006), p.1430

Google Scholar

[5] G.L. Zhang, Q.L. An, Y.S. Zhang, G. Liu and M. Chen: Adv. Mater. Res. Vol. 69 (2009), p.510

Google Scholar

[6] P.A. Usachyov and S.Y. Korytny: Indian. J. Eng. Mater. S Vol. 5 (1998), p.130

Google Scholar

[7] G.G.O.O. Uwadiale and M.A.U. Nwoke: Todays Technology for the Mining and Metallurgical Industries (Kyoto, Japan, October 2-4 1989). p.389

Google Scholar

[8] M.Q. Xu, J.A. Finch, S.R. Rao and D. Lin: Miner. Eng. Vol. 8 (1995), p.1159

Google Scholar

[9] Z.H. Xu, V. Plitt and Q. Liu: Miner. Eng. Vol. 17 (2004), p.1007

Google Scholar

[10] C.Y. Cheng and V.N. Misra: Australas. I. Min. Met. Vol. 99 (1999), p.53

Google Scholar

[11] S. Aslani, H.R.S.B. Hashemi and F. Arianpour: B. Mater. Sci. Vol. 33 (2010), p.697

Google Scholar

[12] D. Mowla, G. Karimi and K. Ostadnezhad: Sep. Purif. Technol. Vol. 58 (2008), p.419

Google Scholar

[13] L. Ergun and S. Ersayin: Miner. Eng. Vol. 15 (2002), p.423

Google Scholar

[14] N. Kotake, M. Kuboki, S. Kiya and Y. Kanda: Adv. Powder. Technol. Vol. 22 (2011), p.86

Google Scholar

[15] J. Kim, G. Dodbiba, H. Tanno, K. Okaya, S. Matsuo and T. Fujita: Miner. Eng. Vol. 23 (2010), p.282

Google Scholar

[16] D.J. Bradshaw, A.M. Buswell, P.J. Harris and Z. Ekmekci: Int. J. Miner. Process. Vol. 78 (2006), p.153

Google Scholar

[17] N.D. Janetski, S.I. Woodburn and R. Woods: Int. J. Miner. Process. Vol. 4 (1977), p.227.

Google Scholar

[18] J. Leja: Surface chemistry of froth flotation-New York. Surface Chemistry of Froth Flotation (New York, America 1982)

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-7975-5_5

Google Scholar