Production Features of Flue Gas Assisted SAGD Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

The SAGD test zone in the Guantao reservoir of the Du84 Block in the Liaohe Oilfield belongs to a massive reservoir with top water, which may have the challenge of top water breakthrough along with the propagation of steam chamber. Flue gas assisted SAGD technique is proposed to slow down water break through. Laboratory experiments have been conducted to study the dissolubility of flue gas in Liaohe dehydrated super-heavy oil. The result of the experiments indicates that the viscosity of oil/gas mixture reduces drastically, and the rate of viscosity reduction almost shows linear increase after flue gas dissolved in super-heavy oil. The steam chamber extension feature and development characteristics of SAGD and flue gas assisted SAGD were compared by numerical simulation. The results show that flue gas exits in the top of reservoir because of gravitational differentiation, which can inhibit steam overlay, reduce heat loss to cap rock, and increase heat efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

1196-1202

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Butler R M. Steam-assisted gravity drainage: concept, development, performance and future [J]. JCPT, 1994, 33 (2): 44-50.

DOI: 10.2118/94-02-05

Google Scholar

[2] Butler R M. Rise of interfering steam chambers [J]. JCPT, 1987, 26 (3): 70-75.

Google Scholar

[3] Liu Zhibo, Cheng Linsong, Ji Youjun, et al. Production features of steam and gas push: Comparative analysis with steam assisted gravity drainage [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(1): 79-83.

DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(11)60016-5

Google Scholar

[4] Liu Shangqi, Wang Xiaochun, Gao Yongrong, et al. Production features of steam and gas push: Comparative analysis with steam assisted gravity drainage [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(1): 79-83.

DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(11)60016-5

Google Scholar

[5] Edmunds N R. Investigation of SAGD steam trap control in two and three dimensions [J]. SPE 50413, 1998.

DOI: 10.2118/50413-ms

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang W, Youn S, Doan Q, et al. Understanding reservoir architectures and steam-chamber growth at Christina Lake, Alberta, by using 4D seismic and cross well seismic imaging [J]. SPE 97808, 2007.

DOI: 10.2118/97808-ms

Google Scholar

[7] Li Zhaomin, Lu Teng, Tao Lei, et al. CO2 and viscosity breaker assisted steam huff and puff technology for horizontal wells in a super-heavy oil reservoir [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(5): 23-24.

DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(11)60059-1

Google Scholar