The Refueling Station Sitting of the HFCV Transportation System: A Programming Model Solution

Article Preview

Abstract:

One of the main barriers to implementing hydrogen for widespread use in HFCV is the high initial cost of infrastructure. Efficiently allocating resources becomes primary importance. This paper focus on the station siting model based on the assumptions of no competition and two decision-making participants. It optimizes the infrastructure of stations built, both with respect to where the customers are and also with cost of delivery distance taken into account in double-leveled programming method. It takes profit of both the programming department and the consumer into consider, the route arrangement’s impact to cost is also being considered. At last, a simple case is enacted to show the applying of hydrogen refueling station siting model. The result proved that the model brings forward is availability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

3224-3228

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Information on http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/pdf/0484(2005).pdf

Google Scholar

[2] J. Hetland and G. Mulder: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 32 (2007), p.736–747.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Nishibori, W. Shin, N. Izu, T. Itoh, I. Matsubara, S. Yasuda and S. Ohtani: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol 34 (2009), pp.2834-2841.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.027

Google Scholar

[4] A. Gromis: An overview of hydrogen station and systems interface, Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference 2005, Vol 7, pp.651-651.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Tajima, K. Imou, S. Yokoyama: Estimation Method for the Construction of Hydrogen Society with Various Biomass Resources in Japan-Project of Cost Reductions in Biomass Transport and Feasibility for Hydrogen Station with Biomass. PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, VOL 22, pp.533-537 .

Google Scholar

[6] ZH.Y. Li, X.M. Pan and J.X. Ma: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol 35 (2010), pp.6822-6829.

Google Scholar

[7] ZH Y. Li, X.M. Pan and J.X. Ma: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol 36 (2011), pp.4079-4086.

Google Scholar

[8] ZH Y. Li, X.M. Pan and J.X. Ma: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol 35 (2010), pp.1515-1521.

Google Scholar

[9] J.Michalski, U.Bunger and C.Stiller: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol 36 (2011), pp.8152-8157.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Bapna and L.S. Thakur et al: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 142 (3) (2002), pp.480-496.

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Guan and A.B. Philpott: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol 134 (2011), pp.289-299.

Google Scholar

[12] G. Andreatta, P. Dell'Olmo and G. Lulli: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 215 (2011), pp.697-704.

Google Scholar

[13] P. Date, A. Canepa and M. Abdel-Jawad: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 214 (2011), pp.749-758.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Kucukaydin, N. Aras and I.K. Altinel: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 208 (2011), pp.206-220.

Google Scholar