Comparison of Principal Factors between China Actual Environmental Risk (CAER) and China Zero Environmental Risk (CZER):Behavior Angle

Article Preview

Abstract:

Studies on comparison of principal factors between CAER (China Actual Environmental Risk) and CZER (China Zero Environmental Risk) from Behavior Angle are seldom found, so we studied the theme above in this thesis. By analysis, we have known that on one hand, there are such aspects in common as natural cause, production action, living action, production waste disposal, and living waste disposal between CAER and CZER. On the other hand, they are different in such aspects as Government surveillance only for CAER, and public management and market management only for CZER. And our related advice is as follows: first, careful protection of natural environment. Secondly strict surveillance on production of waste from such behaviors as enterprise production and human living action by market management, public management, and Government surveillance, etc.. And thirdly great encouragement to arouse interest in technological innovations friendly with the environment in waste disposal, etc..

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

3344-3349

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Q. Liu, in: Economic Operation Risk Management, edited by H. Y. Tang, Universe Academic Press (2011), pp.146-157.

Google Scholar

[2] J. L. Liu, W. H. Liao, Z. X. Zhang, H. T. Zhang, X. J. Wang and N. Meng: Agricultural Sciences in China. Vol. 6, No. 9 (2007), pp.1107-1114. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] D. F. de Roode: Pharmaceutical Technology Europe. June (2010), pp.37-40.

Google Scholar

[4] M. E. Kraft: Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 28, No. 1 (2000), pp.206-218.

Google Scholar

[5] V. K. Smith, W. H. Desvousges: Land Economics. Vol. 64, No. 3 (1988), pp.211-219.

Google Scholar

[6] K. M. Branch, J. A. Bradbury: The Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 34, No. 4 (2006), pp.723-753.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Böhm, H. R. Pfister: Journal of Risk Research. Vol. 8, No. 6 (2005), p.461–479.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Roberts, A. Weale: Innovation and Environmental Risk (Belhaven, 1991).

Google Scholar

[9] R. W. England: Kyklos. Vol. 41, No. 3 (1988), pp.379-395.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Shogren: Risk Analysis (1998), pp.310-315.

Google Scholar

[11] K. M. Branch, J. A. Bradbury: The Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 34, No. 4 (2006), pp.723-753.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Somers, J. H. Svara: Public Administration Review. March/April (2009), pp.181-193.

Google Scholar