Analysis of Products by Conventional and Microwave Induced Pyrolysis for Low Rank Coal

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper describes the products characteristic derived from the conventional pyrolysis (CP) and microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MWP) of low metamorphic coal. GC/MS were used to analyze the volatile fractions of tar obtained by pyrolysis at different temperature and microwave power. It was found that microwave treatment produces more gas and oil than conventional pyrolysis at 800w and 800°C. In addition, the gas from the microwave has much higher syngas (H2 + CO) contents (up to 55 vol. %) than those obtained by conventional hydrolysis (up to 42 vol. %). The tar from the microwave is mainly composed of aromatic pyrolysis and phenolic compounds, and the content is 47.398% and 13.831% respectively as the microwave power is 800w. Meanwhile, the tar component content of C5-C10 from microwave pyrolysis is up to 5 fold than conventional pyrolysis. By contrast, the microwave-assisted pyrolysis is beneficial to the tar conversion to light fraction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

871-875

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Development research group of Blue-coke Industry in Yulin city, Development research report of Blue-coke Industry in Yulin city. China Economic & Trade Herald, 2010, (18: 20-23).

Google Scholar

[2] Ch.L. Wu, Q. Yang, Z.D. Zhu. Thermodynamic analysis and simulation of coal metamorphism in the Fushun Basin[J]. China International Journal of Coal Geology. 2000, 44: 149-168.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-5162(00)00008-2

Google Scholar

[3] Song Yonghui, Su Ting, Lan Xinzhe et al. Microwave Co-pyrolysis Study On Long Flame Coal and Coking Coal [J]. Coal Conversion. 2011, 34 (3): 15-17.

Google Scholar

[4] Lan Xinzhe, Pei Jianjun, Song Yonghui et al. Analysis Of Low Metamorphic Coal During Microwave Pyrolysis [J], Coal Conversion. 2010, 33 (3): 16-18.

Google Scholar

[5] Mermoud. Influence of the pyrolysis heating rate on the steam gasification rate of large wood char particles[J]. Fuel. 2005, 10(85): 4-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.12.004

Google Scholar

[6] Gao Jinsheng.Coal pyrolysis, Coking and Coal Tar Processing [M].Chemical Industry Press. 2010, 259.

Google Scholar

[7] D.A. Jones, T.P. LelyVeld, S.D. Mavrofidis. Microwave heating applications in environmental engineering a review[J]. Resources Conservation and Recyling, 2002, 34: 75-90.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-3449(01)00088-x

Google Scholar

[8] P.R. Solomon, M.A. Serio. Coal pyrolysis: experiments, kinetic rates and mechanisms[J]. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 1992, 18: 133-220.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-1285(92)90021-r

Google Scholar

[9] K. Khalidb, A. Idris. Drying of Silica Sludge Using Microwave Heating[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2004, 5-6(24): 905-918.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.001

Google Scholar

[10] He Guofeng, Dai Hewu, Jin Jialu, Dai Minghua. Relations among Yields, Characterization of Low Temperature Tars and Pyrolysis Temperature [J]. Journal of China Coal Society. 1994, 19 (6): 521-526.

Google Scholar

[11] C.T. Vijayakumar, S. Vinayagamoorthi, J.K. Fink. Characterization of low metamorphic alpine coals: Thermogravimetric studies[J]. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2006, 76 : 191-197.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2005.11.001

Google Scholar

[12] T. Uslu, Atalay, A.I. Arol. Effect of microwave heating on magnetic separation of pyrite[J]. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 2003, (225): 161-167.

DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(03)00362-5

Google Scholar