Effect of K2HPO4, KH2PO4, NaHCO3, and Sodium Ascorbate on Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus during Freeze-Drying

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present study, the experiments were investigated with the effecting of NaHCO3, KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and Sodium ascorbate on survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus during freeze-drying. Designing different concentrations of protective agents, respectively. The survival ratio of Lactobacillus acidophilus and the number of viable cells will be measured after completing drying. In the process, there were major differences between the different concentrations of protective agents in survival during freeze-drying. As the result, the protective agent was playing a key factor affecting the survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus. At present in the study of the experiments, the highest survival rate was NaHCO3 as the protective agent, and when the protective agent as K2HPO4 the number of viable cells was largest.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

284-287

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rinkinen, M., Jalavai, K., Westermarck, E., Salminen, S., &Ouwehand, A. C. Interaction between probiotic LAB and canine enteric pathogens: a risk factor for intestinal Enterococcus faecium colonization,. Veterinary Microbiology, Vol. 92, pp.111-119, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00356-5

Google Scholar

[2] TANNOCK G W . Probiotics and Prebiotics: Where Are We Going?, Wymondham, Caister Academic Press, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] Tiina Mattila-Sandholm and Maria Saarela. Functional dairy products, CRC Press, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] Yoshibumi Miyazaki, Shigeru Kamiya, Tomoko Hanawa. Effect of probiotic bacterial strains of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Enterococcus on enteroaggregative Escherichia coli,. J Infect Chemother, 2007, DOI 10. 1007/s10156-009-0007-2.

DOI: 10.1007/s10156-009-0007-2

Google Scholar

[5] Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR (2001). Invited review: the scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic,. J Dairy Sci 84 (2): 319–331.

DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74481-5

Google Scholar

[6] Márcia R. Silvaa, Glauce Diasb, Célia L.L.F. Ferreirac, Sylvia C.C. Franceschinib and Neuza M.B. Costab. Growth of preschool children was improved when fed an iron-fortified fermented milk beverage supplemented with Lactobacillus acidophilus. Nutrition Research, Volume 28, Issue 4, April 2008, Pages 226-232.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2008.02.002

Google Scholar

[7] Yuan-Kun Lee (2009). Rev. ed. of: Handbook of probiotics 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J. : John Wiley & Sons. p.441–443.

Google Scholar

[8] Anderson J, Gilliland S (1999). Effect of fermented milk (yogurt) containing Lactobacillus acidophilus L1 on serum cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic humans,. J Am Coll Nutr 18 (1): 43–50.

DOI: 10.1080/07315724.1999.10718826

Google Scholar

[9] Djamel Fahloul, Miloud Lahbari , Houcine Benmoussa and Samir Mezdour. Effect of osmotic dehydration on the freeze drying kinetics of apricots. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol. 7(2): 117-121. (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] Leslie S.B., Israeli E., Lighthart B., Crowe J.H., Crowe L.M., Trehalose and sucrose protect both membranes and proteins in intact bacteria during drying, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 (1995) 3592–3597.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.10.3592-3597.1995

Google Scholar