Study on the Stress Relaxation of Polychloroprene Rubber by Molecular Dynamics Simulation at Different Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has been employed to investigate the distribution function of gyration radius under different temperatures. The structure of chloroprene rubber (CR) was constructed and the circles of energy minimization were applied. The fitting functions of normal stress with time under different pressures were obtained. Compression stress relaxation experiment of different temperatures was also conducted. Comparing with the coefficient of stress relaxation from the experiment, it was found that the theoretical stress relaxation results were similar to the experimental data. The results indicated that the mean-square radius of gyration decreased with reduction of temperature, which corresponded to the typical viscoelasticity stress relaxation behaviors of polymers. It is confirmed that the variation of mean-square radius can be used to quantitatively describe the stress relaxation of rubber system and a good agreement between the theoretical curves with the experimental data can be obtained from MD simulation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 532-533)

Pages:

311-315

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Guth, E.; Mark, H: Monatsh. Chem, Vol. 65 (1934).

Google Scholar

[2] H. Y. Chen, E. V. Stepanov, S. P. Chum, A. Hiltner and E. Baer: Macromolecules, Vol. 23 (2000), p.8870–8877.

DOI: 10.1021/ma0003598

Google Scholar

[3] Hua-Gen Peng, Yen Peng Kong and Albert F. Yee: Macromolecules, Vol. 43 (2010), p.409–417.

Google Scholar

[4] R. C. Picu and M. C. Pavel, Macromolecules, Vol. 24 (2003), p.9205–9215.

Google Scholar

[5] Flory, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941, 63, 3083, 3089, 3096, 1952, 74, 2178.

Google Scholar

[6] Georgia Tsolou, Vagelis A. Harman daris, Vlasis G. Mavrantzas: Macromolecular Theory and Simulations, Vol. 15(2006), p.381–393.

Google Scholar

[7] Starr, F.W., Schroder, T.B., Glotzer, S.C.: Macromolecules, Vol. 35 (2002), p.4481–4492.

Google Scholar

[8] Desai, T., Keblinski, P., Kumar, S.K.: Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 122 (2005), pp.910-8.

Google Scholar

[9] Wang, X.Y., Veld, P.J., Lu, Y., Freeman, B.D., Sanchez, I.C.: Polymer, Vol. 46 (2005), p.9155–9161.

Google Scholar

[10] Lee, S., Mattice, W.L.: Computational and Theoretical Polymer Science, Vol. 9 (1999), p.57–61.

Google Scholar

[11] Kruse, J., Kanzow, J., Ratzke, K., Faupel, F., Heuchel, M., Frahn, J., Hofmann, D.: Macromolecules Vol. 38 (2005), p.9638–9643.

DOI: 10.1021/ma0473521

Google Scholar

[12] In-Chul Yeh and Anders Wallqvist: J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 113 (2009), p.12382–12390.

Google Scholar

[13] Xinwu Ba, Haijun Wang, Min Zhao, and Mingxian Li: Macromolecules, Vol. 35 (2002), p.4193–4197.

Google Scholar

[14] Andrea, T.A., Swope, W.C., Andersen, H. C: Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 79 (1983), p.4576–4584.

Google Scholar

[15] J. R. Fried, P. Ren: Comput. Theor. Polym. Sci, Vol. 9 (1999).

Google Scholar