Nonlinear Analysis of EEG Using Fractal Dimension and Approximate Entropy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The automated detection of seizures in EEG is significant for epilepsy monitoring, diagnosis and rehabilitation. In this work, we evaluated the differences between epileptic EEG, interictal EEG and normal EEG by computing their Higuchi Fractal Dimension (HFD) and Approximate Entropy (ApEn). The calculated results show that there are significant differences between epileptic EEG and normal EEG in the variations of HFD and ApEn. HFD and ApEn have been shown to be useful to characterize normal and epileptic brain electrical activities, and the degree of complexity of epileptic EEG is lower than that of normal EEG even during interictal time. Our results could be helpful for interpreting the epileptic brain electrical activity and the normal brain electrical activity, and their neurodynamics.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 532-533)

Pages:

988-992

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. G. Andrzejak, K. Lehnertz, F. Mormann, C. Rieke, P. David, and E. E. Christian: submitted to Phys Rev E, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] M. P. Dafilis, T. J. L. David, and P J Cadusch: submitted to Chaos, (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] P. A. Robinson, C. J. Rennie, and D. L. Rowe: submitted to Phys Rev E, (2002).

Google Scholar

[4] C. J. Stam: submitted to Clinical Neurophysiology, (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] K. Natarajan, U. Acharya, F. Alias, et al.: submitted to BioMedical Engineering OnLine, (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] C. Yamaguchi: submitted to Memoirs of Fukui University of Technology, (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] A. Babloyantz, J. M. Salazar, C. Nicolis: submitted to Physics Letters A, (1985).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Ulbikas, A. Cenys: submitted to Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, (1998).

Google Scholar

[9] J.P. Pijn, J. V. Neerven , A. Noest , et al.: submitted to Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, (1991).

Google Scholar

[10] K.P. Harikrishnan, R. Misra, G. Ambika, and A.K. Kembhavi: submitted to Physica D, (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] T. Higuchi: submitted to Physica D, (1988).

Google Scholar

[12] M. Katz: submitted to Comput. Biol. Med., (1988).

Google Scholar

[13] A. Accardo, M. Affinito, M. Carrozzi, and F. Bouquet: submitted to Biol. Cybern., (1997).

Google Scholar

[14] C. Elger , K. Lehnertz: submitted to European J. Neuroscience, (1997).

Google Scholar

[15] S. M. Pincus: submitted to Proceedings National Academy Sciences USA , (1991).

Google Scholar

[16] S. M. Pincus: submitted to Proceedings National Academy Sciences USA, (1996).

Google Scholar

[17] S. M. Pincus: submitted to Methods in Enzymology, (2000).

Google Scholar