Properties Improvement of Fired Clay Bricks Incorporating with Cigarette Butts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Although small in size, indiscriminate littering of cigarette butts (CBs) can cause serious environmental impact. Several trillion cigarettes produced worldwide annually lead to thousands of kilograms of toxic waste. CBs accumulate in the environment due to the poor biodegradability of the cellulose acetate filters and, in doing so, they have become the most common litter item on our planet. This paper presents some of the results from a continuing study on recycling CBs into fired clay bricks. Physico-mechanical properties of fired clay bricks manufactured with different percentages of CBs (2.5%, 5% and 10%) and also of control brick samples are reported and discussed. To improve the properties, three different mixing times were tested with 7.5% of CBs incorporated in clay bricks, specifically at 15 minutes, 10 minutes and 5 minutes respectively. The impacts of these changes on physical and mechanical characteristics were evaluated. With 15 minutes mixing time, the measurement increased up to 114% and 12% for strength and density respectively compared to 5 minutes mixing time. On the other hand, values for water absorption, initial rate of absorption and tensile strength decreased by 22%, 29% and 5% respectively. Microstructure analyses of CB bricks were also investigated using ESEM. Attempts were also made to improve the properties by incorporating 3% of steel fibre into CB brick samples. Nevertheless, the addition of the steel fibre did not significantly improve the properties or the appearance of the manufactured samples.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 535-537)

Pages:

1723-1730

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2004, September 31). Production, Supply and Distribution, [Online]. Information on http://www. fas.usda.gov/psdonline/.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Mackay, M. Eriksen, and O. Shafey, The Tobacco Atlas 2nd Edition, American Cancer S˚Ciety, (2000), pp.32-33.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Micevskia, M. St. J. Warne, F. Pablo and R. Patra, Variation in, and causes of toxicity of cigarette butts to a clad˚Ceran and microtox, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. vol. 50, pp.205-212, (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/s00244-004-0132-y

Google Scholar

[4] Butt Littering Trust. (2007, April, 10). About Butt Litter [Online]. Information on http://www.buttlitteringtrust.org.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Ach, Biodegradable plastics based on cellulose acetate, J. Macromol Sci Pure Appl Chem A30, pp.733-40, (1993).

Google Scholar

[6] T. A. Brodof, The mechanisms of cellulose acetate degradation and their relationships to environmental weathering, Presented at the 50th Tobacco Chemists' Research Conference, Richmond, Virginia, ˚Ctober, paper 19, (1996).

Google Scholar

[7] T. E. Novotny and F. Zhao, Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use, Tob. Control, vol. 8, no. 1, pp.75-80, (1999).

DOI: 10.1136/tc.8.1.75

Google Scholar

[8] D. Hoffmann, and I. Hoffmann, The changing cigarette, Journal Toxic Environ Health, vol. 15, pp.307-364, (1997).

Google Scholar

[9] S .Li, J. L. Banyasz, Parrish, M. E. Lyons-Hart and K. H. Shafer, Formaldehyde in the gas phase of mainstream smoke", Journal Analyt Appl Pyrol 65, pp.137-145, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2370(01)00185-1

Google Scholar

[10] K. Register, Cigarette butts as litter-toxic as well as ugly?, Bull. Am. Litt. S˚C. vol. 254, pp.23-29, (2000).

Google Scholar

[11] D. Hoffmann, I. Hoffmann and K. El-Bayoumy, The less harmful cigarette: A controversial issue, A tribute to Ernst L. Wynder, Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 14, no. 7, pp.767-790, (2001).

DOI: 10.1021/tx000260u

Google Scholar

[12] P. Turgut and B. Yesilata, Physico-mechanical and thermal performances of newly developed rubber-added bricks, Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, pp.679-688, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.05.002

Google Scholar

[13] P. Turgut and H. M. Algin, Limestone dust and wood sawdust as brick material, Building and Environment, vol. 42, pp.3399-3403, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.012

Google Scholar

[14] I. Demir, An investigation on the production of construction brick with pr˚Cessed waste tea, Building and Environment, vol. 41, pp.1274-1278, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.004

Google Scholar

[15] O. Kayali, High performance bricks from fly ash, Pr˚Ceedings of the World of Coal Ash Conference, Lexinton, Kentucky, (2005).

Google Scholar

[16] K. L. Lin, Feasibility study of using brick made from municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash slag, Journal of Hazardous Materials vol.137, pp.1810-1816, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.027

Google Scholar

[17] S. Veiseh and A. Yousefi, The use of polystyrene in lightweight brick production, Iranian Polymer Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp.324-329, (2003).

Google Scholar

[18] T. Basegio, F. Berutti, A. Bernades and C. P. Bergmann, Environmental and technical aspects of the utilization of tannery sludge as a raw material for clay products, Journal of the European Ceramic S˚Ciety, vol.22, pp.2251-2259, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0955-2219(02)00024-9

Google Scholar

[19] A. Abdul Kadir and A. Abbas Mohajerani, Possible Utilization of Cigarette Butts in Light-Weight Fired Clay Bricks, International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2(3), (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.12.005

Google Scholar

[20] A. Abdul Kadir and A. Abbas Mohajerani, Recycling Cigarette Butts In Light-Weight Fired Clay Bricks, Journal of Construction Materials, Pr˚Ceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (UK), (2011).

DOI: 10.1680/coma.900013

Google Scholar

[21] A. Abdul Kadir, A. Abbas Mohajerani, F. Roddick, J. John Buckeridge, Density, Strength, Thermal Conductivity and Leachate Characteristics of Light-Weight Fired Clay Bricks Incorporating Cigarette Butts, International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2(4), (2010).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.535-537.1723

Google Scholar

[22] Australian/New Zealand Standards AS/NZS 4456.1:2003, Method 1, (2003).

Google Scholar

[23] Australian/New Zealand Standards AS/NZS 3700, (2001).

Google Scholar

[24] Australian/New Zealand Standards, AS/NZS 4455.1:2008. Masonry units, pavers, flags and segmental retaining wall units-Masonry units. (2008).

Google Scholar