Dry Shrinkage and Compressive Strength of Blended Cement Pastes with Fly Ash and Silica Fume

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper reports the drying shrinkage and compressive strength results of cement pastes with fly ash and silica fume. In this study, Portland cement (PC) was used as the basic cementitious material. Fly ash (FA) and silica fume (SF) were used as cement replacement materials at levels of 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% , 40%, 35%, 25%, and 15% by weight of the total cementitious material, respectively. The water/cement (PC + FA + SF) ratios (w/c) was 0.28 by weight. The samples produced from fresh pastes were demoulded after a day; then they were cured at 20 ±1°C with 50 ± 3% relative humidity (RH) until the samples were used for drying shrinkage and compressive strength measurement at various ages. The results show that drying shrinkage and compressive strength increase with increasing SF content, and the optimum composition of blended cement pastes is the cement paste with 30% fly ash and 10% silica fume, which possesses lower drying shrinkage values than that of plain cement paste and higher early age strength than that of blended cement pastes with fly ash. Furthermore, a linear relationship is established between compressive strength and drying shrinkage. By comparing the development of compressive strength and the drying shrinkage deformations, it appears possible to predict the drying shrinkage according to the acquired compressive strength.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 535-537)

Pages:

1735-1738

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.Chatveera and P.Lertwattanaruk, J Environ Manage: Journal of Environmental Management Vol. 90 (2009), p. (1901)

Google Scholar

[2] K.Arikan: Building and Environment Vol. 39(9) (2004), p.1125

Google Scholar

[3] I. Blom, L. Itard and A. Meijer: Building and Environment Vol. 45(11) (2010), p.2526

Google Scholar

[4] R. Rehan and M. Nehdi: Environmental Science and Policy Vol. 8(2), (2005), p.105

Google Scholar

[5] L. Lam, Y.L. Wong and C.S. Poon: Cem Concr Res Vol. 30(5) (2000), p.747

Google Scholar

[6] P. Termkhajornkit, T. Nawa, M. Nakai and T. Saito: Cem Concr Res Vol. 35(3) (2005), p.473

Google Scholar

[7] P. Termkhajornkit and T. Nawa: Cem Concr Res Vol. 34(6) (2004), p.1017

Google Scholar

[8] V. Aggarwal, S.M. Gupta and S.N. Sachdeva: Vol. 2(9) (2010), p.4473

Google Scholar

[9] O. Karahan and C.D. Atis: Vol. 32(2) (2011), p.1044

Google Scholar

[10] V.M. Malhotra, M.H. Zhang, P.H. Read and J. Ryell: ACI Mater J Vol. 97 (2000), p.518

Google Scholar

[11] M.H. Shehata and M.D.A. Thomas: Cem Concr Res Vol .32(3) (2002), p.341

Google Scholar

[12] T.K. Erdem and O. Kirca: Constr Build Mater Vol.22(7) (2008), p.1477

Google Scholar

[13] S.A. Barbhuiya, J.K. Gbagbo, M.I. Russell and P.A.M. Basheer: Construction and Building Materials Vol. 23 (2009), p.3233

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.001

Google Scholar

[14] Thanongsak Nochaiya: Fuel Vol. 89 (2010), p.768

Google Scholar

[15] H. Abdul Razak, H.S. Wong: Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 35(2005), p.688

Google Scholar