Effects of Ramp Rates with Short Holding Time on the Sinterability of Hydroxyapatite

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is by far the closest match to the human bone in terms of chemical composition. Furthermore, HA boasts excellent biocompatibility thus earning its reputation for human bone replacement. However, HA lacks desirable mechanical properties (i.e. hardness, fracture toughness, etc.). Due to the poor heat conductivity of ceramics, it is hypothesized that HA when sintered via conventional pressureless sintering, smaller ramp rates are advantageous as oppose to larger ramp rates. These advantages can be observed as improved densification along with improved mechanical properties. In the present work, the sintering profile for the HA green bodies were held at 1 minute in comparison to the usual 2 hours holding time. The applied ramp rates were 2 °C/min, 5 °C/min and 10 °C/min. Sintering temperatures were set to 1000, 1100, 1200, and 1300 °C. Sample characterization was then reviewed in the aspects of phase stability, % shrinkage, bulk and relative density, Young’s modulus, Vickers hardness, as well as fracture toughness. The results revealed that sintering with shorter holding time yielded an improvement in the mechanical properties of HA. It was observed that sintering HA with a 2 °C/min ramp rate does not result in the formation of extrageneous phases even when sintered to 1300 °C. Similarly at 2 °C/min and 1300 °C, densification was observed to be 99.05 %. In addition, Young’s modulus recorded its highest value (117.03 GPa) when sintered with a ramp rate of 2°C/min. It was also observed that sintering HA at a ramp rate of 2°C/min produced a hardness value of 5.88 GPa (improvement of 0.68 GPa when compared with 2 hours holding time).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

229-234

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. Suchanek, M. Yashima, M. Kakihana and M. Yoshimura: Biomaterials Vol. 18 (1997), p.923 – 933.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00019-7

Google Scholar

[2] G. Muralithran and S. Ramesh: Ceramics International Vol. 26 (2000), p.221 – 230.

Google Scholar

[3] L.L. Hench and J. Wilson: An Introduction to Bioceramics (World Scientific, 1993), p.152.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Zhou, X. Zhang, J. Chen, S. Zeng and K. De Groot: Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Vol. 4 (1993), p.83 – 85.

Google Scholar

[5] P.E. Wang and T.K. Chaki: Journal of Material Science: Materials in Medicine Vol. 4 (1993), p.150 – 158.

Google Scholar

[6] Y.W. Gu, N.H. Loh, K.A. Khor, S.B. Tor and P. Cheang: Biomaterials Vol. 23 (2002), p.37 – 43.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00076-x

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Auger, B. Savoini, A. Muñoz, T. Leguey, M.A., Monge, R. Pareja and J. Victoria: Ceramics International Vol. 35 (2009), p.2373 – 2380.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2009.01.016

Google Scholar

[8] O. Prokopiev, I. Sevostianov: Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 431 (2006), p.218 – 227.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Tolouei, S. Ramesh, C.Y. Tan, M. Amiriyan, I. Sopyan and W.D. Teng: submitted to International Symposium of Materials on Regenerative Medicine (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Ramesh, Malaysia Patent PI 20000349. (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM C1327-08: Standard Test Method for Vickers Indentation Hardness of Advanced Ceramics (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008), DOI: 10. 1520/C1327-08.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Enderle, F. Gotz-Neunhoeffer, M. Gobbels, F.A. Muller and P. Greil: Biomaterials Vol. 26 (2005), p.3379 – 3384.

Google Scholar

[13] J.C. Elliot: Structure and Chemistry of the Apatites and other Calcium Orthophosphates (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1994).

Google Scholar

[14] S. Ramesh, C.Y. Tan, K.L. Aw, W.H. Yeo, M. Hamdi, I. Sopyan and W.D. Teng: The Medical Journal of Malaysia Vol 63 (2008), p.89 – 90.

Google Scholar