Production of Gaseous Fuel from High-Ash Tailings by Pyrolysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

he characteristics of pyrolysis gaseous are conducted out in a laboratory pyrolysis unit with a 30 g charge at vary finial temperature .Based on isothermal thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was also applied to study the effects of heating rate on the pyrolysis characteristics of tailings in nitrogen atmosphere. The TG/DTG results show that the heating rate increases, the temperature of volatile matter initiation increases, the total volatile matter evolved decreases and the DTG peak shifts toward higher temperature range. The experiment indicated that with increasing heating temperature in rank, total gas, caloric value, H2 and CO yields gradually increases and CH4 and CO2 first increase and then decrease for all samples. The evolution behavior of gaseous products during primary devolatilisation (400–550°C)and secondary devolatilisation (700–850°C) was also discussed. The results showed that the gas yield was up to 4.306L and the largest capacity hydrogen production was 1.72L in the 950°C and by the charge (30 g ).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 550-553)

Pages:

458-463

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Karen N. Finney. The reuse of spent mushroom compost and coal tailings for energy recovery: Comparison of thermaltreatment technologies.Bioresource Technology 100 (2009) 310–315.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.054

Google Scholar

[2] Changkook Ryu, Palletized fuel production from coal tailings and spent mushroom compost — Part I Identification of pelletisation parameters. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY 89 ( 2008 ) 269 –275

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.11.035

Google Scholar

[3] Liu Haibina, Liu Zhenling .Recycling utilization patterns of coal mining waste in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54 (2010) 1331–1340.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.05.005

Google Scholar

[4] E.Sabah, Z.E. Erkan.Interaction mechanism of flocculants with coal waste slurry. Fuel 85 (2006) 350–359.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.06.005

Google Scholar

[5] Noble R, Dobrovin-Pennington A. Partial substitution of peat in mushroom casing with fine particle coal tailings. Scientia Horticulturae 2005;104:351–67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.09.004

Google Scholar

[6] Thompson MJ. Spoil disposal. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 1982;4(2–3):87–90.

Google Scholar

[7] Chugh YP, Patwardhan A. Mine-mouth power and process steam generation using fine coal waste fuel. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2004;40:225–43.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-3449(03)00071-5

Google Scholar

[8] Tiwari KK, Basu SK, Bit KC, Banerjee S, Mishra KK. High-concentration coal–water slurry from Indian coals using newly developed additives. Fuel Processing Technology 2004;85(1):31–4

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(03)00095-x

Google Scholar

[9] H. Hu, Q. Zhou, S. Zhu, B. Meyer, S. Krzack, G. Chen, Product distribution and sulfur behavior in coal pyrolysis, Fuel Process. Technol. 85 (2004) 849–861.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.030

Google Scholar

[10] G.Gryglewicz, Effectiveness of high temperature pyrolysis in sulfur removal from coal, Fuel Process. Technol. 46 (1996) 217–226.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-3820(95)00061-5

Google Scholar

[11] Q.Zhou, H. Hu, Q. Liu, S. Zhu, R. Zhao, Effect of atmosphere on evolution of sulfurcontaining gases during coal pyrolysis, Energy Fuels 19 (2005) 892–897.

DOI: 10.1021/ef049773p

Google Scholar

[12] S.Karaca, Desulfurization of a Turkish lignite at various gas atmospheres by pyrolysis: effect of mineral matter, Fuel 82 (2003) 1509–1516.

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(03)00068-1

Google Scholar

[13] A.Czaplicki, W. Smolka, Sulfur distribution within coal pyrolysis products, Fuel Process. Technol. 55 (1998) 1–11

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(97)00052-0

Google Scholar

[14] Chugh, Y.P., Patwardhan, A., 2004. Mine-mouth power and process steam generation using fine coal waste fuel. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 40, 225–243.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-3449(03)00071-5

Google Scholar

[15] Radloff, B., Kirsten, M., Anderson, R., 2004. Wallerawang colliery rehabilitation: the coal tailings briquetting process. Minerals Engineering 17, 153–157.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2003.10.023

Google Scholar

[16] Noble, R., Dobrovin-Pennington, A., 2005. Partial substitution of peat in mushroom casing with fine particle coal tailings. Scientia Horticulturae 104, 351–367.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.09.004

Google Scholar

[17] Karen N. Finney , Changkook Ryu, Vida N. Sharifi, Jim Swithenbank. The reuse of spent mushroom compost and coal tailings for energy recovery:Comparison of thermal treatment technologies. Bioresource Technology 100 (2009) 310–315.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.054

Google Scholar

[18] Gao H, Murata S, Nomura M, Ishigaki M, Qu M, Tokuda M. Energy Fuels 1997;11(3):730–8.

Google Scholar

[19] Smith KL. The structure and reaction processes of coal. New York: Plenum Press; 1994.

Google Scholar

[20] Howard JB. Fundamentals of coal pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis. In: Elliott MA, editor. Chemistry of coal utilization. New York: Willey;1981. p.665.

Google Scholar

[21] Gale TK, Bartholomew CH, Fletcher TH. Combust Flame 1995;100(1/2):94–100.

Google Scholar

[22] Khan MR, Walker PL, Jenkins RG. Fuel 1988;67(5):693–9.

Google Scholar

[23] Fletcher TH. Fuel 1993;72(11):1485–95.

Google Scholar

[24] Khan MR, Jenkins RG. Fuel 1986;65:725–31.

Google Scholar

[25] M.A. Serageldin, W.P. Pan, Thermochim. Acta 76 (1984) 145.

Google Scholar

[26] A. Arenillas, F. Rubiera, J.J. Pis, M.J. Cuesta, M.J. Iglesias, A. Jiménez, I.Suárez-Ruiz,Thermal behavior during the pyrolysis of low rank perhydrous coals, J. Anal. Appl.Pyrolysis 68–69 (2003) 371–385.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2370(03)00031-7

Google Scholar

[27] A. Arenillas, F. Rubiera, J.J. Pis, Simultaneous thermogravimetric–mass spectrometricstudy on the pyrolysis behaviour of different rank coals, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 50(1999) 31–46.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2370(99)00024-8

Google Scholar