Determination of Pentachlorophenol and Sodium Pentachlorophenolate in Fishery Products by Acetic Anhydride Derivatization/GC/μ-ECD

Yong Fu Shi; Wen Qin Liu; Dong Mei Huang; Xuan Yun Huang; Hui Juan Yu; Jie Xu; Yuan Wang; You Qiong Cai

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.554-556.1470

Paper Titles

Inhibitory Effect on Lipid and Protein Oxidation of Clove Extracts in Surimi from Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and the Possible Mode of Action
p.1447

Analysis and Evaluation of Nutrition Composition of Mussel
p.1455

Drying Characteristics and Process Optimization of Vacuum Far-Infrared Radiation Drying on Cornus officinalis
p.1459

Influence of Osmotic Agent Concentration and Drying Temperature on the Osmotic Dehydration of Pomelo
p.1466

Determination of Pentachlorophenol and Sodium Pentachlorophenolate in Fishery Products by Acetic Anhydride Derivatization/GC/μ-ECD
p.1470

The Anti-Fatigue Effect of Black Soybean Peptide in Mice
p.1475

Changes in Muscle Protein Fractions of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) during Early Storage Period
p.1483

Improvements in Functionalities of Porcine Serum Protein Hydrolysates Induced by Free Hydroxyl Radical
p.1487

Rapid Determination of Formaldehyde in Dried Bean Milk Cream by HPLC with Pre-Column Derivatization
p.1493

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 554-556Determination of Pentachlorophenol and Sodium...

Determination of Pentachlorophenol and Sodium Pentachlorophenolate in Fishery Products by Acetic Anhydride Derivatization/GC/μ-ECD

Abstract:

A method was estimated to detect pentachlorophenol and sodium pentachlorophenolate in fishery products by gas chromatography with μ-ECD detector. Procedures of the method included extraction, alkaline stripping and derivatization. The pH of sample matrix was modified to 3-4 by nitric acid solution(nitric acid:water 1:1). Target compounds were extracted by hexane first and 0.2mol/L potassium hydroxide solution was used as stripping reagent to isolate pentachlorophenol from hexane. Acetic anhydride was taken as derivatizing reagent to convert target compounds into nonpolar ester compounds according to acylation reaction. Derivatized compound was extracted by hexane for the analysis of GC. The limit of detection is 2µg/kg . The average recoveries ranged from 73.01 to 104.68% spiked at 2.0,4.0,10.0µg/kg. And the relative standard deviations ranged from1.5 to 8.3%. The method can be used for the determination of pentachlorophenol and sodium pentachlorophenolate in fishery products,and it provides an rapid and acute method for food safety determination.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 554-556)

Pages:

1470-1474

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.554-556.1470

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2012

Authors:

Yong Fu Shi, Wen Qin Liu, Dong Mei Huang, Xuan Yun Huang, Hui Juan Yu, Jie Xu, Yuan Wang, You Qiong Cai

Keywords:

Acetic Anhydride, Fishery Products, Food Safety, Gas Chromatography (GC), Pentachlorophenol, Sodium Pentachlorophenolate

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] D.Tan, J B.Zhang J. Environmental pollution &control.Vol.30, ( 2008),pp.7-20.

Google Scholar

[2] H. Allaoua, R. Chicheportiche. European Journal of Pharmacology, Vol.163, (1989), pp.327-335.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Laitner, R. Erben, G.I.V. Klobučar . Toxicology Letters, Vol.74, (1994), p.45.

Google Scholar

[4] L.L. Lu, T. Mamiya, P. Lu, K. Toriumi, A. Mouri, M. Hiramatsu, L.B. Zou, Toshitaka Nabeshima. Behavioural Brain Research. Vol.220 (2011),pp.132-139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.01.035

Google Scholar

[5] H. J.Chang. Environment and Health. Vol. 19,( 2002),pp.279-230.

Google Scholar

[6] M.N. Abbas, G.A.E. Mostafa and A.M.A. Talanta. Vol .55,(2001),p.647–656.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Oubin, D. Puig, J. Gascon , D. barcelo. Anal. Chim. Acta, Vol. 346 ,(1997),p.49–59.

Google Scholar

[8] O. Jauregui and M.T. Galceran. Anal. Chim. Acta, Vol. 340, (1997),p.191–199.

Google Scholar

[9] H.C. Hong, H.Y. Zhou, T.G. Luan, C.Y. Lan. Environment International . Vol.31,(2005),p.643 – 649.

Google Scholar

[10] S.J. Young, J.P. Hart, A.A. Downman and D.C. Cowell. Biosens. Bioelectron., Vol.16 (2001),p.887–894.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Mufeed Awawdeh, H. James Harmon. Biosensors and Bioelectronics.20,(2005),pp.1595-1601

Google Scholar

[12] L. Lin, L.C Liao. J.Forensic Science and Technologe. Vol.2(2004),pp.10-13.

Google Scholar

[13] Z. Q.Huang, H Y Nie, S.H Peng. J.Analytical Chemistry. Vol.20,( 1991),pp.38-40.

Google Scholar

[14] Z.L Fei. J.Nanjing Normal University Natural Science Edition. Vol.27,( 2004),pp.70-73.

Google Scholar