Reliability Assessment for CNC Equipment Based on Multi-Parameter Degradation Data

Article Preview

Abstract:

The modern high-end CNC equipment with high reliability and long life expectancy makes traditional methods of equipment reliability assessment difficult due to the multiple performance parameters as well as less failures and degradation data. This paper proposes a performance reliability assessment based on multiple parameter degradation data, which deals with reliability evaluation with small numbers of samples. With the analysis of performance degradation processes and rules, the framework of the performance reliability assessment for multiple parameters is proposed. Using the degradation data of multiple performance parameters of CNC equipment, a covariance matrix is built to determine the correlation between the performance parameters. The degradation trajectories of the performance parameter(s) are curve fitted by Support vector machines (SVM). The reliability when the degradation curve reaches its specified threshold is calculated. According to both the reliabilities of non-relevant performance parameters and relevant performance parameters, the joint reliability of the system is calculated. Finally, using a specific type of CNC machine tool as an example, the performance reliability assessment method is verified.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 562-564)

Pages:

908-912

Citation:

Online since:

August 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bae S.J., Kuo W., Kvam P.H., Degradation models and implied lifetime distributions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92, 601-608.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.02.002

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang Yong-qiang, Liu Qi, Zhou Jing-lun. Reliability Evaluation Based on Normal-poisson Process on Condition of Small Sampling Test. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2006, 28(3): 128-132.

Google Scholar

[3] Jayaram J S R, Girish T. Reliability prediction through degradation data modeling using a quasi-likelihood approach. Proceedings Annual Reliability &Maintainability Symposium. NewYork: IEEE, 2005: 193-199.

DOI: 10.1109/rams.2005.1408361

Google Scholar

[4] Hamada M., Martza H.F., Reeseb C.S., etc. A fully Bayesian approach for combining multilevel failure information in fault tree quantification and optimal follow-on resource allocation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2004, 86(3): 297-305.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.02.001

Google Scholar

[5] Phuc D.V., Anne B., Christophe B., Reliability importance analysis of Markovian systems at steady state using perturbation analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 20(2): 1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.020

Google Scholar

[6] Guo Haitao, Yang Xianhui. Automatic creation of Markov models for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 93: 807-815.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.029

Google Scholar

[7] Cardoso J.B., Almeida J.R., Dias J.M., Coelho P.G., Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks. Advances in Engineering Software, 2008, 39(6): 505-513.

DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.015

Google Scholar

[8] Stella M C, Jan H G, Timothy W S. Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. J Mech Design, 2005, 127(6): 1076-1087.

Google Scholar

[9] Ping-Feng Pai, Wei-Chiang Hong. Support Vector Machine with Simulated Annealing Algorithms in Electricity Load Forecast. Energy Converastion & Management, 2005: 2669-2688.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.02.004

Google Scholar

[10] Fang Jun, Wei Xing, Fan Lixia. Reliability Evaluation and Application based on Multiple Performance Degradation. Equipment Environmental Engineering, 2008, 5(5): 29-32.

Google Scholar

[11] Theodor F, Hu S J. Impact of machining parameters on machine reliability and system productivity. J Manuf Sci E-T ASME, 2002, 124(2): 296-304.

Google Scholar