Sensor Optimization for Cutting Status Monitoring in Single Manufacturing Unit

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effectiveness of status monitoring in cutting process is contingent on the effectiveness of the sensor location optimization. A novel adaptive evolutionary algorithm (AEA) based on genetic algorithm (GA) to achieve an optimal sensor configuration for monitoring the cutting status closely related to the workpiece quality is proposed. Based on an understanding of the cutting principle, the minimal failure probability at minimum cost is the optimal target and the detectability and the false alarm rate are defined as the constraint conditions. The feasible region of solution is presented in decimal coding . The crossover operator and population size are adapted relative to the iterations estimated by a Markov model,which improve the convergence. The results of a case study have been found to agree well with the optimized results by AEA .The optimal scheme of AEA yields the minimal sensing stations while simultaneously attaining 99.99% system detectability and renders nearly 60% decrease in sensor cost in comparison to the scheme of saturated sensing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

636-639

Citation:

Online since:

September 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V. Gupta,M. Sharma and N. Thakur: Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures Vol. 21(2010), p.1227.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Khan and D. Ceglarek: Journal of manufacturing science and engineering Vol. 122(2000), p.215.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Ding,P. Kim and D. Ceglarek: IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation Vol. 19(2003), p.543.

Google Scholar

[4] J. w. Sun,L. f. Xi, E. s. Pan, S. c. Du and T. b. Xia: Computers in Industry Vol. 60(2009), p.501.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Fan, L. Xu, X. Zhao, H. Fan and K. Huang: Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument Vol. 26(2005), p.83.

Google Scholar

[6] W. q. Lin,J. z. Fu,Y. z. Xu and Z. c. Chen: Optics and Precision Engineering Vol. 16(2008), p.1682.

Google Scholar

[7] J. V. Abellan Nebot, J. Liu and S. F. Romero: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Vol. 28(2012), p.208.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Bagajewica and A. Fuxman: AIChE Journal Vol. 50(2004), p.1870.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Zeng: Technology of Testability and Diagnosis for Electronic Equipment (Aviation Industry Press, Beijing 1995).

Google Scholar

[10] C. M. Grinstead and J. L. Snell: Introduction to probability, 2nd edn. (American Mathematical Society, Providence 2006).

Google Scholar

[11] K. F. Martin: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture Vol. 34(1994), p.527.

Google Scholar

[12] S.L. Ding R.I.R.A.,J.P.T. Mo and Y.W. Zhu: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 458(2011), p.289.

Google Scholar

[13] R. Yan and R. X. Gao: Journal of Vibration and Acoustics Vol. 130(2008), p.021007.

Google Scholar