Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour of AISI 50100 Precipitation Hardened Steel after Welding

Amir Sultan; Riffat Asim Pasha; Sayyid Masood Ur Rehman Shah; Haris Ali; Asim Zulfiqar

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.570.9

Paper Titles

Foreword, Introduction and Committees

Characterization of Hyperelastic (Rubber) Material Using Uniaxial and Biaxial Tension Tests
p.1

Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour of AISI 50100 Precipitation Hardened Steel after Welding
p.9

Thermo-Mechanical Testing of Epoxy Shape Memory Polymer Composites
p.15

Prediction of Delamination Crack Growth in Carbon/Fiber Epoxy Composite Laminates Using a Non-Local Cohesive Zone Modeling
p.25

Microstructure Study of Propellant Binder
p.37

Microstructure and Corrosion Resistance of Dissimilar Welded Joints between Duplex Stainless Steel and Austenitic Stainless Steel
p.43

Design of Tape Wound Composite Cylindrical Shells Incorporating Different Failure Criteria and Winding Kinematics
p.53

Effects of Stitching Parameters on Tensile Strength of FRPs under Hygrothermal Conditions
p.63

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 570Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour of AISI 50100...

Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour of AISI 50100 Precipitation Hardened Steel after Welding

Abstract:

Single-edged notched tension (SENT) specimen is used to study the fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) behavior of AISI 50100 steel using MTS 810. Calibration tests are run to get plots of crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) vs. Load and CMOD vs. Crack length to width ratio with the known crack lengths. FCGR of welded and un-welded specimens are plotted against stress intensity range to show the effect of welding on fatigue crack growth rate of AISI 50100 steel, initial results of the experimentation are presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Materials for Applied Science and Technology II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 570)

Pages:

9-14

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.570.9

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2012

Authors:

Amir Sultan, Riffat Asim Pasha, Sayyid Masood Ur Rehman Shah, Haris Ali, Asim Zulfiqar

Keywords:

CMOD, Fatigue Crack Growth (FCG), Precipitation Hardened Steel, SENT, Stress Intensity Range, Weld

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] T. Lessen and N. Recho: Fatigue Life analysis of Welded Structures, ISTE, ISBN-10: 1-905209-54-1, U.K., (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Horikawa, A. Sakakibara, and T. Mori: The effect of welding tensile residual stresses on fatigue crack propagation in low propagation rate region, Trans. Jpn. Weld. Res. Inst., Vol. 18 (No. 2), 1989, pp.125-132.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Wöhler, Z. BAUW, Vol 10, 1860, P 583.

Google Scholar

[4] R. E. Little: Tables for Estimating Median Fatigue Limits, STP 731, American Society for Testing and Materials, (1981).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Ohta, N. Suzuki and Y, Maeda: Unique fatigue threshold and growth properties of welded joints in a tensile residual stress field, Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 19, 1997, pp.303-310.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(97)00049-2

Google Scholar

[6] Yan-Hui Zhang, S.J. Maddox: Fatigue life prediction for toe ground welded joints, Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 31, 2009, pp.1124-1136.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.003

Google Scholar

[7] T. Nykanen, G. Marquis, T. Bjork, A simplified fatigue assessment method for high quality welded cruciform joints, Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 31, 2009, pp.79-87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.016

Google Scholar

[8] L.W. Tasy, C.S. Chung, C, Chen, Fatigue crack propagation of D6AC laser welds, Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 19, 1997, pp.25-31.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(96)00049-7

Google Scholar

[9] M. Shah, C. Mabru and R. Rezai-Aria: Investigation of Crack Propagation in X38CrMoV5 (AISI H11) Tool Steel at Elevated Temperatures, Procedia Engineering 2(2010) 2045-(2054).

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.220

Google Scholar

[10] M. S. G. Chiodo and C. Ruggieri: J and CTOD Estimation Procedure for Circumferential Surface Cracks in Pipes Under Bending, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 77 (2010) 415–436.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.10.001

Google Scholar

[11] R. John and B. Rigling: Effect of height to width ratio on K and CMOD solutions for single edge cracked geometry with clamped ends, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 60, No. 2, 1998, pp.146-156.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(98)00009-5

Google Scholar

[12] N. Marchand, D. M. Parks and R. M. Pelloux: K-soulutions for single edge notch specimens under fixed end displacements, International Journal of Fracture, 1986, 31, 53-65.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00033929

Google Scholar

[13] J. Ahmad, V. Papasptropoulos and A. T. Hooper: Elastic plastic analysis of edge-notched panels subjected to fixed grip loading, Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 1991, 38, 283-294.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(91)90006-m

Google Scholar