Data-Driven Tolerance Analysis for Products Assembly

Abstract:

Article Preview

Tolerance characteristics have an important influence on products dynamic properties. To realize dynamic properties oriented tolerance analysis and design of mechanical products, a data-driven based tolerance analysis method was proposed. Firstly, based on the cloud model theory, an assemble cloud model was established, and a new method of assembly data processing and knowledge mining was proposed. Secondly, the assembly cloud model was used to analysis the measured data from practical assembly process and search the alignment laws. Finally, using the above mentioned methods, product key parts tolerance was analyzed and adjusted, and the product quality consistency could be improved dramatically.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Liangzhong Jiang

Pages:

287-296

Citation:

B. Z. Wu et al., "Data-Driven Tolerance Analysis for Products Assembly", Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 590, pp. 287-296, 2012

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Hu S.J., Stream of Variation Theory for Automotive Body Assembly, Annals Of The Cirp, 1997, Vol. 46/1, pl-6.

[2] Liu S. Charles, Hu S. Jack, An Offset Finite Element Model and Its Applications in Predicting Sheet Metal Assembly Variation, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 1995, Vol. 35, No. 11, pp.1545-1557.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)00103-q

[3] Liu S. Charles, Hu S. Jack, Variation Simulation for deformable Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Finite Element Methods, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1997, Vol. 119, pp.368-374.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2831115

[4] Cai W, Hu S.J. and Yuan J. X: Deformable Sheet Metal Fixturing: Principles, Algorithms, and Simulations, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1999, Vol. 121, pp.771-777.

[5] Liu S. Charles, Hu S. Jack, Sheet Metal Joint Configurations and Their Variation Characteristics, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1998, Vol. 120, pp.461-467.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2830147

[6] Mantripragada Ramakrishna, Whitney Daniel E. Modeling and Controlling Variation Propagation in Mechanical Assemblies Using State Transition Models, IEEE Transactions On Robotics and Automation, 1999, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp.124-140.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/70.744608

[7] Srinivasan Vijay, On Interpreting Key Characteristics, Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September 12-15, 1999, Las Vegas, Nevada.

[8] Lee Don J., Thornton Anna C, The Identification and Use of Key Characteristics In the Product Development Process, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, August 18-22, 1996, Irvine, California.

[9] Thornton Anna C., Mathematical Framework for the Key Characteristic Process, Research in Engineering Design-Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering, 1999, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.145-157.

[10] Thornton Anna C., Variation Risk Management Using Modeling and Sinulation, Journal of Mechanical Design, 1999, Vol. 121, pp.297-303.

[11] Thornton Anna C., Quantitative Selection of Variation Reduction Plans, Journal of Mechanical Design, 2000, Vol. 122, pp.185-193.

[12] Chase K.W., Magleby S.P., Glancy C.G., A Comprehensive System for Computer-Aided Tolerance Analysis of 2-D and 3-D Mechanical Assemblies, Proceedings of the 5th CIRP Seminar on Computer-Aided Tolerancing, Toronto, Ontario, April 28-29, (1997).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5797-5_23

[13] Chase K.W., Parkinson A.R., A survey of research in the application of tolerance analysis to the design of mechanical assemblies, Research in Engineering Design, 1991, Vol. 3, pp.23-37.

[14] Chase K.W., Gao J., Magleby S.P., General 2-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments, Journal of Design and Manufacturing, 1995, Vol. 5, pp.263-274.

[15] Chase K.W., Greenwood W.H., Loosli B.G., Hauglund L.F., Least cost tolerance allocation for mechanical assemblies with automated process selection, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division(Publication)DE, 1989, Vol. 16, pp.165-171.

[16] Gao Jinsong, Chase Kenneth W., Magleby Spencer P., Generalized 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments, IIE Transactions(Institute of Industrial Engineers), 1998, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.367-377.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179808966476

[17] Gao Jinsong, Chase Kenneth W., Magleby Spencer P., Comparison of assembly tolerance analysis by Direct Linearization and modified Monte Carlo simulation methods, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division(Publication)DE, 1995, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp.353-360.

[18] Chase Kenneth W., Gao Jinsong, Magleby Spencer P., Sorensen Carl D., Including geometric feature variations in tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies, IIE Transactions(Institute of Industrial Engineers), 1996, Vol. 28, No. 10, pp.795-807.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15458830.1996.11770732

[19] Merkley Karl, Chase ken, Breaking down tolerance stack-up, Machine Design, 1997, Vol. 69, No. 8, pp.71-74.

[20] Merkley Karl, Tolerance Analysis of Compliant Assemblies, [Dissertation], Provo, Utah, USA, Brigham Young University, (1998).

[21] Jeffreys D. Leaney P.G., Dimensional control as an integral part of next-generation aircraft development, Proc Instn Mech Engrs., Part B, 2000, Vol. 214, No. 9, pp.831-835.

[22] Johannesson Hans, Soderberg Rikard, Structure and matrix models for tolerance analysis from configuration to detail design, Research in Engineering Design-Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering, 2000, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.112-125.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001630050027

[23] LiDeyi,DuYi. Uncertanty Artificial Intelligence[M]. BeiJing:National Defence Industry Press, (2005).