The Simulation of the UAV Collision Avoidance Based on the Artificial Potential Field Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

To deal with dynamic path planning of unmanned aerial vehicles(uav) in the complicated 3-D environment, a new method that combines the Lyapunov theorem with the artificial potential is proposed. The mission region is described as the artificial potential field. In this paper, it proves that the balance point is a saddle point, only when uav reaches the target, the balance point is stable, the rest of the balance point are divergent, so uav can escape the minimum point as soon as possible. The simulation results show that this proposed method can effectively make uav avoid collision, and escape well the local minimum value point. The optimization results are better than the simplex artificial potential field, and have better optimization precision and tracing speed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 591-593)

Pages:

1400-1404

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] LI Meng, WANG Dao-bo, BAI Ting-ting and SHENG Shou-zhao. UAV Route Planning Based on Ant Colony Optimization and Artificial Potential[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2012, 30(2).

Google Scholar

[2] Jiangmin Chunyu, Zhihua Qu, Eytan Pollak and Mark Falash. Reactive Target-tracking Control with Obstacle Avoidance of Unicycle-type Mobile Robots in a Dynamic Environment. American Control Conference, 2010, pp.1190-1195.

DOI: 10.1109/acc.2010.5531019

Google Scholar

[3] Jiangmin Chunyu, Zhihua Qu, Eytan Pollak and Mark Falash. A New Reactive Target-tracking Control with Obstacle Avoidance in a Dynamic Environment. American Control Conference, 2009, pp.3872-3877.

DOI: 10.1109/acc.2009.5160362

Google Scholar

[4] Li Ji and Sun Xiuxia. A route plannings method for unmanned aerial vehicles based on improved A-star algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, VOL. 29(2008)NO. (7): 788- 792. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Kothari M, Postlethwaite I and Gu D W. Multi-UAV path panning in obstacle rich environments using rapidly exploring random trees [C]/Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Piscataway: IEEE, 2009, pp.3069-3074.

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2009.5400108

Google Scholar

[6] DuanHaibin, Yu Yaxiang and Zhang Xiangyin. Three dimension path planning for UCAV using hybrid meta-heuristic ACO-DE algorithm [J]. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, VOL. 18(2010)NO. 8: 1104-1115.

DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2009.10.006

Google Scholar

[7] Dorigo M, Maniezzo V and Colorni A. Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cyber- netics: Part B, VOL. 26(1996)NO. (1).

DOI: 10.1109/3477.484436

Google Scholar

[8] Khatib O. Real time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobiles robots [J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, VOL5(1986)NO. 1.

Google Scholar

[9] N.Y. Ko and B.H. Lee. Avoidability measure in moving obstacle avoidance problem and its use for robot motion planning, Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. pp.1296-1303, (1996).

DOI: 10.1109/iros.1996.568984

Google Scholar

[10] S. Mastellone, D. M. Stipanovic, C. R. Graunke, K. A. Intlekofer and M. W. Spong. Formation control and collision avoidance for multi-agent non-holonomic systems: theory and experimen- ts The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.107-126, (2008).

DOI: 10.1177/0278364907084441

Google Scholar

[11] A. Chakravarthy, and D. Ghose, Obstacle avoidance in a dynamic environment: a collision cone approach, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (1998).

DOI: 10.1109/3468.709600

Google Scholar

[12] C. Fulgenzi,A. Spalanzani and C. Laugier, Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance in uncertain environment combining PVOs and Occupancy Grid, Proc. Of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2007.363554

Google Scholar