The Influence of Heat and Moisture Transfer in Soil on the Performance of the Ground Heat Exchanger

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, a numerical heat and moisture transfer model (HMTM) and a pure conduction model (PCM) were established separately for unsaturated soil around the ground heat exchanger (GHE) and were numerically solved by finite volume method. The simulation results indicate that rejecting heat into soil can reduce moisture content in the vicinity of the borehole wall. When the initial moisture content is high, moister transfer has little effect on soil thermal properties. In this case, the results of the HMTM and the PCM are basically identical. On the contrary, when the initial moisture content is low, the thermal effect has significant influence on moisture transfer around the borehole wall, and the soil thermal properties will change correspondingly. In this case, there is a large difference between the results of these two models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 594-597)

Pages:

2120-2127

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Yang, P. Cui, Z. Fang. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(1): 16-27

Google Scholar

[2] De Vries D. A.. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1987, 30(7): 1343-1350

Google Scholar

[3] Dantas L. B., Orlande H. R. B., Cotta R. M.. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2002, 41(3): 217-227

Google Scholar

[4] W. Yu, Z. Chen, M. Shi. Academic Journal of Southeast University, 1994, 24(S1): 63-67 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] M. Chen, F. Jin, Y. Chen. Academic Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 1998, 19(3): 325-329 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] De Moel M., Bach P. M., Bouazza A., et al. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(9): 2683-2696

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.027

Google Scholar

[7] Philip J R., De Vries D. A.. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 1957, 38(2): 222-232

Google Scholar