Analysis Models of Storm Runoff Volumes from Small Watershed in Chongqing Metropolitan Area

Article Preview

Abstract:

The storm runoff model in mountain city, based on hydrology, hydraulics and the watershed spatial data is targeted at the features of large slope of land surface and fast speed of runoff-contribution & flow-concentration in mountain city, is of great significance to achieve the goal of making an analog experiment on the processing of urban storm runoff, to locate the inland inundation spot and predict the time of the water withdrawal as well as manage and utilize the water volume and quality of the storm runoff. As a result, we’ve developed a distributed storm runoff model in small watershed in the mountain city on the basis of GIS platform. This model has been applied for analyzing the storm runoff (twice) in Panxi River Valley in North New Zone of Chongqing. The results showed that the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient, Ens is 0.56; and the relative error is 11.8%, compared the simulated result with the actual measurements 2010/6/7; the Ens is 0.76,; and the relative error is 8.82%, compared the simulated result with the actual measurements 2010/7/4, it showed that the simulated result is of high precision with the model. According to the parameter sensitivity analysis, the most sensitive parameters of the storm runoff model are the width of subcatchment, slope and impermeable area rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

762-768

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Giorgio Camorani , Attilio Castellarin, Armando Brath. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2005, 30:561-574

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Wang , Y. Y. Chen. Plateau Meteorology, 2007, 26(3): 609-614. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] K. G. Wen, L. Ma. Ceremony of meteorological disasters in China: Study in Chongqing [M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2008. 243-289

Google Scholar

[4] J. X. Liu, W. Y. Shao. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006,37(2):184-188. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] Irina Ribarovaa, Plamen Ninov, David Cooper. Ecological Modeling, 2007, 10:1-6

Google Scholar

[6] Y. F. Xue, X. Y. Wang, L. F. Wang, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009,32 (10):103-108. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] Lewis A Rossman. Storm Water Management Model User's Manual, Version 5.0.(2008)

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Chen, Y. L. Zhang, Y. C. Foong, et al. China Water &Wastewater, 2009, 25(22):17-24. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] G. P. Chen, D. J. Zhan, J. N. Hong. China Water &Wastewater, 1993, 9(1):37-40. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Y. Xie, D. M. Li, P. Y. Li, et al. Advances in Water Science, 2005, 16 (3) :384- 390. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] X. Y. Xu, J. Liu, Q. Q. Hao, et al. Advances in Water Science, 2003, 14(2):193-196. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[12] K. J. Beven. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling[M]. Beijing: China Waterpower Press, 2007 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] C. M. Liu, H. X. Zheng, Z. G. Wang, et al. Distributed Simulation of Water cycle[M]. Zhengzhou:Yellow River Conservancy Press (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] H. P. Hu, F. Q. Tian. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007,38(5):511-517 ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[15] H. T. Wan, C. H. Zhou, Q. Wan. Progress in Geography, 2001,20(4):347-354 ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[16] N. Z. Zaghloul. Advance in Water Resources, 1983, 6: 214- 223.

Google Scholar

[17] D. Q. Zhao, H. Z. Wang, J. N. Chen, et al. Advances in Water Science, ,2009,20(1):46-51 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[18] H. C. Wang, P. F. Du, D. Q. Zhao, et al. China Environmental Science, 2008,28(8):725~729. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[19] Z. W. Wang, W. P. Cheng. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) ,2002,36(5):582-587. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar