Laboratory Measurement and Numerical Simulation of Evaporation Fluxes from a Thin Clay Layer

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to measure evaporation fluxes from a thin clay layer in high precision, an enclosed chamber with high precision balance setting at the bottom was designed. It can control the humidity inside and measure mass changes with time automatically. Two clay samples in depth about 20mm were tested in laboratory and the data measurement lasted for 6 days. In the first 2 days, the evaporation flux was close to distilled water surface evaporation with the ratio between two values of 0.9. Within 3-5 days, the evaporation ratio reduced from 0.9 to 0.1. In the 6th days, the clay layer tended to dry and the evaporation ratio was close to zero. In contrast with laboratory test results, a numerical simulation was conducted by SEEP/W. The computed cumulative evaporation was only 0.14mm less than measured value, with the relative error no more than 4.1%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

777-780

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. L. Penman, Natural evapotranspiration from open water, bare soil and grass, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series A), 193(1948) 120-146.

Google Scholar

[2] I.J. Barton, A parameterization of the evaporation from unsaturated surfaces, Journal of Applied Meteorology,18(1979) 43-47.

Google Scholar

[3] C.W. Boast, Evaporation from bare soil measured with high spatial resolution, Agronomy. 9(1986) 899-900.

Google Scholar

[4] Z.D. Lei, Soil water dynamics, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 1988. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] G.W. Wilson, D.G. Fredlund, and S.L. Barbour, Coupled soil atmosphere modeling for soil evaporation, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31(1994) 151-161.

DOI: 10.1139/t94-021

Google Scholar

[6] G.W. Wilson, D.G. Fredlund, and S.L. Barbour, The effect of soil suction on evaporative fluxes from soil surfaces, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34(1997) 145-155.

DOI: 10.1139/t96-078

Google Scholar

[7] R.G. Allen, W.O. Pruitt, D. Raes, M. Smith, L.S. Pereira, Estimating Evaporation from Bare Soil and the Crop Coefficient for the Initial Period Using Common Soils Information, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 131(2005) 14-23.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2005)131:1(14)

Google Scholar

[8] M. Sakai, N. Toride, J. Šimůnek, Water and Vapor Movement with Condensation and Evaporation in a Sandy Column, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73(2009) 707-717.

DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0094

Google Scholar

[9] X. Xiao, R. Horton, T. J. Sauer, J. L. Heitman, T. Ren, Cumulative Soil Water Evaporation as a Function of Depth and Time, Vadose Zone Journal, 10(2011) 1016–1022.

DOI: 10.2136/vzj2010.0070

Google Scholar

[10] M. Gran, J. Carrera1, S. Olivella, and M.W. Saalt, Modeling evaporation processes in a saline soil from saturation to oven dry conditions, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(2011) 2077–2089.

DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-2077-2011

Google Scholar