Action Mechanism of Psychological Empowerment on OCBs

Article Preview

Abstract:

The relationship between psychology and behavior has been the investigative hotspot in management. In recent years, the scholars have been paid more attention to relationship between OCBs and psychological empowerment. Most of the studies following this line consider that psychological empowerment has a direct impact on OCBs, however, this paper following the research of Anna-Lena Ackfeldt and Leonard V. Coote holds the antecedents of psychological empowerment is put into effect and produce different empowerment, then through the moderating effect of the antecedents of OCBs stimulate different organizational citizenship behaviors, and then builds the comprehensive action mechanism of psychological empowerment on OCBs, this establishes the theoretical foundation for the empirical analysis in the future.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

420-425

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Katz D. Motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 1964, 9: 131-146.

Google Scholar

[2] Katz, D., Sc Kahn, R. L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, (1978).

Google Scholar

[3] Bateman T S, Organ D W. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: the relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26: 587-595.

DOI: 10.5465/255908

Google Scholar

[4] Organ, D. W. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, (1988).

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1989.4282145

Google Scholar

[5] Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., Near, J.P. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983, 68: 653-663.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653

Google Scholar

[6] Randolf, W. A. (1995), Navigating the Journey to Empowerment, Organization Dynamics, Spring: 19-32.

Google Scholar

[7] Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332-349.

DOI: 10.5465/20159585

Google Scholar

[8] George, J. M. State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76: 299-307.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.299

Google Scholar

[9] Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L. Individualism collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organization citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1995, 16: 127-142.

DOI: 10.1002/job.4030160204

Google Scholar

[10] Organ, D. W. The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1990, 12: 43-72.

Google Scholar

[11] Organ, D. W., Konovsky, M. A. Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74: 157-164.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.157

Google Scholar

[12] Organ, D. W., Ryan, K. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 1995, 48(4): 775- 802.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x

Google Scholar

[13] Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M. A., MacKenzie, S. B. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82: 262-270.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262

Google Scholar

[14] Graham, J. W. An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1991, 4: 249-270.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01385031

Google Scholar

[15] Organ, D. W. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 1997, 10(2): 85-97.

DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2

Google Scholar

[16] Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., Dienesch, R. M. Organizational citizenship behavior: construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37: 765-802.

DOI: 10.5465/256600

Google Scholar

[17] Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S. J. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, 81: 525-531.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525

Google Scholar

[18] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., Bachrach, D. G. Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 2000, 26: 513-563.

DOI: 10.1177/014920630002600307

Google Scholar

[19] Stamper, C.L., & Van Dyne, L. (2003). Organizational citizenship: A comparison between part-time and full-time service employees. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-8804(03)90034-6

Google Scholar

[20] Song, L.J., Tsui, A.S. (2008), Unpacking Employee Responses to Organizational Exchange Mechanisms: The Role of Social and Economic Exchange Perceptions, Journal of Management Online, First published on July 16, (2008).

DOI: 10.1177/0149206308321544

Google Scholar

[23] Kwantes, C.T. (2003), Organizational Citizenship and Withdrawal Behaviors in the USA and India: Does Commitment Make a Difference?, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management; Vol. 3, pp.5-11.

DOI: 10.1177/1470595803003001847

Google Scholar

[22] Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1988.4306983

Google Scholar

[23] Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.

DOI: 10.2307/256865

Google Scholar

[24] Thomas, K.W., & Velthouse, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive, model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1990.4310926

Google Scholar

[25] Siegall, M., & Gardner, S. (2000). Contextual factors of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 29, 703–722.

DOI: 10.1108/00483480010296474

Google Scholar

[26] Menon, S.T. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 153–180.

DOI: 10.1111/1464-0597.00052

Google Scholar

[27] Bogler, Ronit, & Somech, Anit (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers' organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and teacher education, 20(3), 277-289.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003

Google Scholar

[28] Ackfeldt, Anna-Lena and Leonard V. Coote. 2005. A study of organizational behaviors in a retail setting., Journal of Business Research 58: 151-159.

DOI: 10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00110-3

Google Scholar

[29] Rioux, S., & Penner, L.A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1303-1314.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1306

Google Scholar

[30] Farh, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1990), Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction, Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp.705-721.

DOI: 10.1177/014920639001600404

Google Scholar

[31] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., and Bachrach, D. G. (2000).

Google Scholar

[32] Hui C, Law K, Chen ZX. A Structural equation model of the effects of negative affectively, leader–member exchange, and perceived job mobility on in-role and extra-role performance: a Chinese case. Org Behav Human Decis Process 1999; 77: 3– 21.

DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2812

Google Scholar