Paper Titles

The Supply Chain Automorphism from the Perspective of Metadata Ontology: An Extended Supply-Chain Operations Reference-Model
p.554

A Game Theory Based Analysis of the Tacit Knowledge Sharing and Incentive Mechanism
p.564

An Interval Optimization Model of Multi-Criteria Parameters in the Process of Selecting Manufacturing Suppliers
p.570

Study on Management of Software Engineering Capability in Japan through Cross-Section Analysis and Panel Analysis
p.576

Bridging the Gap between Technology and Business within Corporate Governance of Enterprise: Focus Areas of Special Attention in the Technology Domain
p.584

Tactic of Supply Chain Coordination when the Freight Cost of Unit Product is Sensitive to Lot Size
p.593

The Moderating Effect of Usage Experience on the Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction: The Case of Non-Profit Organizations Offering Web Services
p.599

The Effect of Government Technology Funding on Business R & D Expenditure in China and OECD Countries
p.606

Mould Risk Assessment Based on RST-BN Approach
p.611

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 601Bridging the Gap between Technology and Business...

Bridging the Gap between Technology and Business within Corporate Governance of Enterprise: Focus Areas of Special Attention in the Technology Domain

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper describes the importance of technology within the corporate governance of companies, representing two main domains in enterprise architecture: business architecture and IT architecture, helping to bridge the gap between the two main domains. IT Architecture is considered as a key domain in corporative governance, giving the adequate support to business architecture that helps to improve business. Due to evolution in markets of products and services, and technological changes, as well as the strong impact of technology on all areas of business, it is necessary to clearly distinguish the importance of the IT architecture domain, as well as focus attention on the different areas related in the technology domain.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Management, Manufacturing and Materials Engineering II

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 601)

Pages:

584-592

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.601.584

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Igor Aguilar Alonso, José Carrillo Verdún, Edmundo Tovar Caro

Keywords:

Business Architecture, Corporative Governance, Demand Management, Enterprise Architecture, IT Architecture

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jim Sphorer, Service Science: The next frontier in Service Innovation, IBM Corporation. Produced in Singapore, June (2007).

[2] Roberto Newell and Gregory Wilson, A Premiun for Good Governance, McKinsey Quarterly, no 3 (2002).

[3] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Directorate Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise affairs, OECD, Principles of Corporate Governance, SG/CG(99) 5 and 219. April (1999).

[4] Governance: The CIO's – and the Board's – Business. Compuware.

[5] I. Aguilar. J. Carrillo and E. Tovar, IT, Senior Executives and Board of Directors Contribute to the Success of the Business: Implicates on the IT Demand Process - Life Cycle, 2009 Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology. 24–26 November 2009 Seoul, Korea, 2009 IEEE DOI 10. 1109/ICCIT. 2009. 288. p.149.

DOI: 10.1109/iccit.2009.288

[6] Convergent Thinking among the C-Suite: Why Integration and Collaboration spell big Opportunity for CIOs, IBM Corporation, June (2008).

[7] I. Aguilar. J. Carrillo and E. Tovar, IT, Senior Executives and Board of Directors Contribute to the Success of the Business: Implicates on the IT Demand Process - Life Cycle, 2009 Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology. 24–26 November 2009 Seoul, Korea, 2009 IEEE DOI 10. 1109/ICCIT. 2009. 288. p.149.

DOI: 10.1109/iccit.2009.288

[8] P. Weill and J. W. Ross, IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decisions for Superior Results, Harvard Business School Press; 2004, pp.6-7.

[9] Luis F. Ramos Molinaro, Karoll Haussler Carneiro Ramos, Humberto Abdalla Jr, Joao Mello da Silva, Flavio Elias de Deus, Annibal Alfonso Neto, Governance and Management of Information Technology: Descomposing the Enterprise in Modular Building Blocks based on Enterprise Architecture and Business Oriented Services,. Centeris 2009. Ofir Portugal.

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61692-020-3.ch003

[10] IBM Academy Technology Study. An Introduction to IBM's Enterprise Architecture Consulting Method, Version 2. 0, 3rd. February (2006).

[11] John Wiley & Sons Governance of the Extended Enterprise. Bridging Business and IT Strategies. Enterprise Architecture: Governance Implementation for the Extended Enterprise. IT Governance Institute. New Jersey 2005. pp.87-88.

[12] Stephen S. Bonham. IT Portfolio Management. Artech House. 2004. p.118 – 119.

[13] P. Weill and J. W. Ross, IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decisions for Superior Results, Harvard Business School Press; 2004, p.30.

[14] [Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT, Peter Weill, March 2004, CISR WP No. 341 and Sloan WP No. 4493-04.

[15] Garcia Arzumendi et al, Arquitectura de Sistemas de Información, II congreso Nacional de Informatica de la Salud, (1997).

[16] Malhotra,Y., Enterprise Architecture: An Overview, (1996).

[17] J. Ross, Creting a Strategic IT Architecture Competency Learning in Stages, MIS Quarterly Executive 2, Nº 1, 31-43. (2003).