Treatment Mechanisms and Operation Conditions of Arsenic Removal from Copper Smelting Effluent Using Combined Process of Aeration Micro-Electrolysis and Flocculation

Article Preview

Abstract:

An effective combined process of aeration micro-electrolysis and flocculation was utilized to treat arsenic that incoming contaminate level was 153 mgL-1 from the metallurgical effluent. Treatment mechanisms and operation conditions were discussed which influenced the removal efficiency of arsenic. Under the optimal technological conditions, it was found that the removal efficiencies of COD and As were 92.5% and 99.7% respectively. The remain arsenic concentration in the treated wastewater was only 0.43mgL-1 and met National Wastewater Discharge Standard(GB8978-1996) in China. Analysis by SEM and EDS revealed that using combined process, most of As(III) could be oxidized to As(V), which led to the high efficiency of arsenic removal. In the meantime, most of other heavy metals, such as Cu, Pb and Ni, had been removed. Therefore, the combined process is regarded as a promising technology in the treatment of arsenic from copper smelting effluent. It has bright future in application.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

2307-2318

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Lorenzen, J.S.J. van Deventer and W. M. Landi: Min. Eng Vol.8(1995), p.557

Google Scholar

[2] M. Leist, R. J. Casey and D. Caridi: J. Hazard. Mater Vol. B76(2000), p.125

Google Scholar

[3] F. J. Lu: Appl. Organometallic Chem Vol.4(1990), p.191

Google Scholar

[4] B. He, Y. Fang ,G. Jiang and Z. Ni: Spectrochim. Acta Vol. B57(2002) , p.1705

Google Scholar

[5] J. Zhang, L. P. Xie and Z. X. Hu: Journal of Tianjin Polytechnic University Vol. 28(2009), p.62

Google Scholar

[6] H. Cheng, W. Xu, J. Liu, H. Wang, Y. He and G. Chen:J. Hazard. Mater Vol.146(2007) , p.385

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Hongshao and R. Seith: Environ. Sci. Technol Vol. 35(2001), p.4753

Google Scholar

[8] O. X. Leupin and S. J. Hug: Water Res Vol. 39(2005), p.1729

Google Scholar

[9] Yang, X. Y: J. Hazard. Mater Vol. 169 (2009), p.480

Google Scholar

[10] X. Sun and H. Doner: Soil Sci Vol.163(1998), p.278

Google Scholar

[11] M. Borho and P. Wilderer; Water Sci. Technol Vol. 34(1996), p.25

Google Scholar

[12] C. Escudero, N. Fiol, I. Villaescusa and J. C. Bollinger: J. Hazard. Mater Vol. 164(2009), p.533

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Jia and G.P. Demopoulos:Water Res Vol. 42(2008) , p.661

Google Scholar

[14] M. Mohapatra, S.K. Sahoo, S. Anand and R.P. Das: J. Colloid Interface Sci Vol. 298(2006), p.6

Google Scholar

[15] T. Hiemstra and W. van Riemsdijk : J Colloid Interface Sci Vol. 210(1999), p.182

Google Scholar

[16] L. M. Ma, Z. G. Ding, T. Y. Gao, R. F. Zhou, W. Y. Xu and J. Liu: Chemosphere Vol. 55(2004), p.1207

Google Scholar