Study on Potential Impacts of Genetically Modified Cultivation on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the application and promotion of genetically modified crops, the safe of Bt-transgenic crops on soil had become one of the hot spot. In present study, two parallel experiments were conducted to compare the impacts of transgenic cotton on the rhizosphere soil properties in northern China. The results showed that the pH value increased, except for the cotton 33B. Furthermore, the change extent varied with Bt transgenic cotton and non Bt cotton. In addition, organic total carbon、 total nitrogen and available nitrogen decreased, while these of GK-12 increased. In general, the effect was different from cotton cultivar. Available P and K in the rhizosphere zone increased among all cotton cultivars tested, and no significant difference was found between Bt and non-Bt cotton

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

3005-3012

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Betz FS, Hammond BG and Fuchs RL. 2000.Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis protected plants to control insect pest. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 32(2): 156-173

DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2000.1426

Google Scholar

[2] Sun C - X, Chen L - J,Wu z - J. 2002. Research advances in soil persistence characteristics of toxins released by transgenic Bt crops and their relationships with soil properties. Chin J Appt Ecol,13(11):1478-1482(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Motavlli PP, Kremer RJ, Fang M, et a1 .2004.Impact of genetically modified crops and their management on soil microbially plant nutrient transformations. J Environ Quit. 33(3)816-824

DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0816

Google Scholar

[4] Sun Xiangyang editor. Soil Science [M ]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2005 .

Google Scholar

[5] Aronson AI,Beckman W.Dunn P.1986.Bacillus thuringiensis and related insect pathogens. Microbiol Rev. 50: 1~24

DOI: 10.1128/mr.50.1.1-24.1986

Google Scholar

[6] Bietlot H, Carey PR, Choma C,et a1. 1989.Facile preparation and characterization of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki. Biochem J. 260:81~97

DOI: 10.1042/bj2600087

Google Scholar

[7] Crecchio C.Stotzky G .1998.Insecticidal activity and biodegradation of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound to humic acids from soil .Soil Biochem,30(4):463~470

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00147-8

Google Scholar

[8] Crecchio C. Stotzky G.2001. Biodegradation and insecticidal activity of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound to complexes of montmorillonite-humic acids—AI hydroxypolymers. Soil Biol Biochem. 33: 573~581

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00199-1

Google Scholar

[9] Dick WA. Tabatabai AM.1993. Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. Soil Mif Ecol, 2: 95~127

Google Scholar

[10] Fusi P, Ristori G, Calamai L. et a1. 1989. Adsorption and binding to protein on "clean" (homoionic) and "dirty" (coated with Fe hydroxides)motmorillonite illite and kaolinite. Soil Biol Biochem, 21:911~920

DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(89)90080-1

Google Scholar

[11] Koskella J, Stotzky G. 1997.Microbial utilization of free and clay bound insecticidal toxins from and their retention of insecticidal activity after incubation with microbes. Appl Environ Microbiol, 63:3561~3568

DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.9.3561-3568.1997

Google Scholar

[12] Stevenson FJ ed. 1982.Humus Chemistry:Genesis, Composition, Reactants. New York: Wiley.

Google Scholar

[13] Stotzky G.1986. Influence of soil mineral colloids on metabolic processes, growth, adhesion, and ecology of microbes and viruses. In: Huang PM ,Schnitzer Meds.Interactions of Soil Minerals with Natural Organics and Microbes .Madison WI: Soil Science Society America 305~428.

DOI: 10.2136/sssaspecpub17.c10

Google Scholar

[14] Stotzky G.2000. Persistence and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from and of bacterial DNA bound on clays and humic acids. J Econ Entomol , 29: 691~705

DOI: 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900030003x

Google Scholar

[15] Tapp H, Calamail, Stotzky G. 1994. Adsorption and binding of the insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiends subsp. kurstaki and subsp. Tenebrionis on clay. Soil Biol Biochem,26:663~679

DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90258-5

Google Scholar

[16] Tapp H, Stotzky G .1995. Dot blot enzyme-1inked immumosorbent assay for monitoring the fate of Bacillus thuringiends in soil .Appl Environ Microbiol, 61: 602~609

DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.2.602-609.1995

Google Scholar

[17] Tapp H,Stotzky G.1995. Insecticidal activity toxins from Bacillus thuringiends subsp. kurstaki and tenebrionis absorbed and bound on pure and soil clays. Appl Environ Microbiol,61: 1786~1790

DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.5.1786-1790.1995

Google Scholar

[18] Tapp H, Stotzky G .1997. Monitoring of insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiends in soil by flow cytometry. Can J Microbiol,43:1074~1078

DOI: 10.1139/m97-153

Google Scholar

[19] Tapp H, Stotzky G. 1998. Persistance of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiends subsp. kurstaki in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 30: 471~476

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00148-x

Google Scholar

[20] Vaeck M,Reynanerts A,Hofre H,et a1.1987. Transgenic plants Van Rie J, McGaughey WH, Jonhson DE,et a1 .1990. Mechnism of insect resistance to the microbial insecticide of Bacillus thuringiends. Science,247:72~74

DOI: 10.1126/science.2294593

Google Scholar

[21] Wang J-W, Feng Y-J,Luo S-M.2002. Effects of transgenic crops on soil ecosystem .Chin. App1. Eco, 13 (4):491~494 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[22] Sun C - X et al.2006,Changes of nutrients in soil of transgenic Bt crops. Chin. App1. Eco, 17 (5):943—946 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar