Mechanisms and Remediation Technologies of Sulfate Removal from Acid Mine Drainage

Article Preview

Abstract:

Acid mine drainage (AMD) has properties of extreme acidification, quantities of sulfate and elevated levels of soluble heavy metals. It was a widespread environmental problem that caused adverse effects to the qualities of ground water and surface water. In the past decades, most of investigations were focused on the heavy metals as their toxicities for human and animals. As another main constitution of AMD, sulfate ion is nontoxic, yet high concentration of sulfate ion can cause many problems such as soil acidification, metal corrosion and health problems. More attention should be paid on the sulfate ion when people focus on the AMD. In the paper, sulfate removal mechanisms include adsorption, precipitation, co-precipitation and biological reduction were analyzed and summarized. Meanwhile, the remediation technologies, especially the applications of them in China were also presented and discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

3252-3256

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Akcil, S. Koldas. Journal of Cleaner Production.14 (2006) 1139-1145.

Google Scholar

[2] C. Lin, Y. Wu, W. Lu, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials.142 (2007) 199-207.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Dold, L. Fontbote´. Chemical Geology. 189 (2002) 135-163.

Google Scholar

[4] C.A. R´ıos, C.D. Williams and C.L. Roberts. Journal of Hazardous Materials.156 (2008) 23-35.

Google Scholar

[5] H.H. Tabak, R. Govind. Biodegradation. 14(2003)437-452.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Nyquist, M. Greger. Ecological Engineering. 35 (2009) 630-642.

Google Scholar

[7] W. Cao, Z. Dang, X.Q. Zhou, et al. Carbohydrate Polymers.85 (2011) 571-577.

Google Scholar

[8] A.S. Sheoran,V. Sheoran. Minerals Engineering.19 (2006) 105-116.

Google Scholar

[9] C.H. Wu, C.Y. Kuo, C.F. Lin, et al. Chemosphere.47 (2002) 283-292.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Moret and J. Rubio. Minerals Engineering.16 (2003)715-722.

Google Scholar

[11] R.P.J.J. Rietra, T. Hiemstra, W. H. van Riemsdijk. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 218 (1999) 511-521.

DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1999.6408

Google Scholar

[12] C. Boukhalfa.Desalination. 250(2010)428-432.

Google Scholar

[13] D. R. Mulinari, M. L. C. P. D. Silva. Carbohydrate Polymers.74 (2008)617-620.

Google Scholar

[14] C. Namasivayam , D. Sangeetha. Desalination, 219(2008) 1-13.

Google Scholar

[15] R. Silva, L. Cadorin, J. Rubio. Minerals Engineering.23 (2010) 1220-1226.

Google Scholar

[16] J. Lu, T.H. Chen, J. Wu, et al. Bioresource Technology.102(2011) 10401–10406.

Google Scholar

[17] M. Kalin. Ecological Engineering. 22 (2004) 299–304.

Google Scholar

[18] K. Tang, V. Baskaran. Biochemical Engineering.44 (2009) 73–94.

Google Scholar

[19] B.C. Aube, S. Payant. The Geco process:A new high density sludge treatment for acid mine drainage ,Proceedings of the fourth international conference on acid rock drainage.May31-June 6, Vancouver B.C.,1997.

Google Scholar

[20] J.J. Gusek. Reality check: passive treatment of mine drainage-an emerging technology or proven methodology, The Society of Mining Engineering Annual meeting. February 28, Salt lake city, Utah USA, 2000.

Google Scholar

[21] M. C. Costa, J. C. Duarte. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 165 (2005)325–345.

Google Scholar

[22] P.L. Younger, R.H. Coulton, E.C. Froggatt. Science of the Total Environment. 338(2005) 137-154.

Google Scholar