Analytical Modeling and Parameter Extraction of Organic Thin Film Transistor: Effect of Contact Resistance, Doping Concentration and Field Dependent Mobility

Article Preview

Abstract:

For what is believed to be for the first time, the device physics based modeling approach to derive the generic model current equations of organic thin film transistor (OTFT) is described. Firstly, the current model equation is derived by considering the dependence of mobility on gate voltage and doping density, which is more realistic and relevant to organic materials containing TFTs. To model small molecule or polymer TFT, the potential drop across contacts is taken into account as contacts are not ohmic due to some morphological disorders. Further the effect of contact resistance is included and accordingly the generic model current equation is modified. It shows a good agreement of proposed current equation with simulated results which validates the proposed OTFT model from ohmic to saturation regime. Moreover, the analytical model is used to extract the contact and channel resistances in linear and saturation region and these resistances are verified through potential cut line (PCL) and transmission line methods (TLM). The extracted parameters are not only used to verify the electrical characteristics but also exhibit insight on contact potential, charge injection and transport phenomenon for organic TFT operation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 622-623)

Pages:

585-589

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yoshinori Ishikawa, Yasuo Wada, Toru Toyabe: Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 107 (2010), p.053709.

Google Scholar

[2] H. Klauk: Chemical Society Reviews Vol. 39 (2010), pp.2643-2666.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Natali, L. Fumagalli and M. Sampietro: Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 101 (2007), pp.014501-12.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Burgi, T.J. Richards, R.H. Friend and H. Sirringhaus: Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 94 (2003), pp.6129-6137.

Google Scholar

[5] D. Oberhoff, K.P. Pernstich, D.J. Gundlach and B. Batlogg: Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 5522 (2004), pp.69-80.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Estrada: Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 49 (2005), pp.1009-1016.

Google Scholar

[7] O. Marinov, M.J. Deen, U. Zschieschang and H. Klauk: IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices, Vol. 56 (2009), pp.2952-2961.

DOI: 10.1109/ted.2009.2033308

Google Scholar

[8] D. Gupta, N. Jeon and S. Yoo: Organic Electronics, Vol. 9 (2008) , pp.1026-1031.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Hong, G. Yerubandi, H.Q. Chiang, M.C. Spiegelberg and J.F. Wager: Critical Reviews in Solid State and materials Sciences, Vol. 33 (2008), pp.101-132.

DOI: 10.1080/10408430701384808

Google Scholar

[10] H. Klauk and U. Zschieschang: Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 102 (2007), pp.074514-17.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Cosseddu and A. Bonfiglio: Thin solid Films, Vol. 515 (2007), pp.7551-7555.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Mittal, B. Kumar, B.K. Kaushik, Y. S Negi and R. K Singh: IJCA Special Issue on Optimization and On-chip Communication, Vol. (OOC-1) (2012), pp.11-17.

Google Scholar

[13] C.J. Bettinger and Z. Bao: Advanced Materials, Vol. 22 (2010), pp.65-655.

Google Scholar