Trajectory Planning and Prediction Guidance Based on the Moon-Earth Return Reentry Dynamics

Biao Zhao; Nai Gang Cui; Ji Feng Guo; Ping Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.625.100

Paper Titles

Study on Building Seismic Design Based on Mechanics Properties with Economical Assessment
p.79

Effects of the Launch Speed on Hydrodynamic Force of the Underwater Vehicle Vertical Launch with the Gas Curtain
p.84

Graphic Method for Design of Eccentric Slider-Crank Mechanism and Analyzing of Feasible Region
p.88

Analysis and Optimization of Level-I Vibration Absorption of Single Drum Vibratory Roller
p.93

Trajectory Planning and Prediction Guidance Based on the Moon-Earth Return Reentry Dynamics
p.100

Numerical Simulation of Sphere Impacting Water by SPH with Hydrodynamics
p.104

Reentry Trajectory Planning Based on the Secondary Reversal Dynamics for the Second Generation Reusable Launch Vehicles
p.109

Hydrocyclone Velocity Flow Simulation and Experimental Study Based on Fluid Mechanics
p.113

Hydrocyclone Two Phase Flow Experimental Research Based on Fluid Mechanics
p.117

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 625Trajectory Planning and Prediction Guidance Based...

Trajectory Planning and Prediction Guidance Based on the Moon-Earth Return Reentry Dynamics

Abstract:

For the lunar return mission, a concern of the entry guidance requirement is the full flight envelope applicability and landing accuracy control. A concise numeric predictor-corrector (NPC) entry guidance (NPCEG) algorithm is developed for this requirement. It plans a real-time trajectory on-line by modulating the linear parameterized bank profile. To meet the path constraint, we propose an integrated guidance strategy which combines NPC method with an analytical constant drag acceleration method. Monte Carlo analysis shows that the algorithm is sufficiently robust to allow precision landing with a delivery error of less than 2.0 km for the entire between 2,500 km and 10,000 km range.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Research on Mechanics, Dynamic Systems and Material Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 625)

Pages:

100-103

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.625.100

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Biao Zhao, Nai Gang Cui, Ji Feng Guo, Ping Wang

Keywords:

Lunar Return, Prediction Guidance, Reentry Dynamics, Trajectory Planning

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] J.R. Rea, Z.R. Putnamy, A comparison of two Orion skip entry guidance algorithms, AIAA GN&C Conference, Hilton Head, (2007) pp.1-20.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-6424

Google Scholar

[2] M.A. Tigges, B.D. Bihari, J. -P. Stephens, Orion capsule handling qualities for atmospheric entry, AIAA GN&C Conference, Portland, (2011) pp.1-30.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-6264

Google Scholar

[3] S.H. Bairstow, Reentry guidance with extended range capability for low L/D spacecraft, PhD thesis, MIT, Boston, (2006) pp.39-48, 57-62.

Google Scholar

[4] C.W. Brunner, P. Lu, Comparison of numerical predictor-corrector and Apollo skip entry guidance algorithms, AIAA GN&C Conference, Toronto, (2010) pp.1-20.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-8307

Google Scholar

[5] M.A. Tigges, T. Crull, J.R. Rea, Numerical skip entry guidance, AAS G&C Conference, Breckenridge, (2007) pp.2-21.

Google Scholar

[6] D.J. Lickly, H.R. Morth, B.S. Crawford, Apollo entry guidance, NASA (Ed. ), NASA Langley research center, Hampton, (1963) pp.1-18.

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Miller, Managing energy and mode transitions in skip entry guidance for lunar return trajectories, PhD thesis, MIT, Boston, (2009) pp.45-55.

Google Scholar

[8] NASA-STD-3000, NASA man-systems integration standards, (1995) pp.1-79.

Google Scholar