Optimization of Material Removal Rate in EDM Using Taguchi Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an investigation on the effect and optimization of machining parameters on material removal rate (MRR) in electrical discharge machining (EDM) of EN31 tool steel. For the experiment, four process parameters viz. pulse on time, pulse off time, discharge current and voltage are considered. The settings of machining parameters are determined by using Taguchis orthogonal array (OA). L27 orthogonal array (OA) is considered for the study. The level of importance of the machining parameters on MRR is determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The optimum machining parameter combination is obtained by the analysis of signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio. The analysis shows that discharge current has the most significant effect on MRR followed by pulse off time and voltage. It is seen that with an increase in discharge current and pulse off time, MRR increases in the studied range. The methodology described here is expected to be highly beneficial to manufacturing industries.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

270-274

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K.H. Ho and S.T. Newman: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 43(13) (2003), pp.1287-1300.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Snoyes and F.V. Dijck: Annals of CIRP, Vol. 20 (1) (1971), pp.35-36.

Google Scholar

[3] K.M. Tsai and P.J. Wang: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 41 (2001), pp.1385-1403.

Google Scholar

[4] P.J. Wang and K.M. Tsai: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 114 (1) (2001), pp.1-17.

Google Scholar

[5] N. Tosun, C. Cogun and G. Tosun: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 152 (2004), p.316–322.

Google Scholar

[6] C.J. Luis, I. Puertas and G. Villa: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 164–165 (2005), p.889–896.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Palanikumar: Materials and Design Vol. 28 (2007), p.2611–2618.

Google Scholar

[8] A.G. Jaharah, C.G. Liang, S.Z. Wahid, M.N.A. Rahman and C.H.C. Hassan: International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering (IJMME), Vol. 3 (1) (2008), pp.25-29.

Google Scholar

[9] P. Kuppan, A. Rajadurai and S. Narayanan: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 38 (2008), p.74–84.

Google Scholar

[10] K.T. Chiang: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 37 (2008), p.523–533.

Google Scholar

[11] K.M. Patel, P.M. Pandey and P.V. Rao: International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials, Vol. 27 (2009), p.892–899.

Google Scholar

[12] V. Parashar, A. Rehman, J.L. Bhagoria and Y.M. Puri: International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2(5) (2010), pp.1021-1028.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Taguchi, in: Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productiviy Organization, Tokyo (1990).

Google Scholar

[14] P.G. Ross, in: Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering, 2nd Edn, McGrawhill, New York (1996).

Google Scholar

[15] Minitab User Manual Release 14 MINITAB Inc, State College, PA, USA, (2003).

Google Scholar