Experimental Research on Molding Biomass’s Carbonization Homogeneity

Article Preview

Abstract:

Molding biomass’s carbonization homogeneity was studied through doing research on temperature difference of surface and inside of biomass by making experiments. Molding biomass’s size is larger than that of small dimension biomass and carbonization in whole biomass is different to some extent. But endothermic and exothermic effect in pyrolysis process and mass transfer of volatile are beneficial to carbonization homogeneity. When biomass average heating rate becomes larger, the maximum temperature difference of surface and inside becomes larger, besides that the temperature of biomass is higher when molding biomass’s carbonization is homogeneous. Maximum temperature differences were 30, 76, 137 °C respectively when biomass average heating rates were 5, 10, 20 °C/min. In order to ensure homogeneity, carbonization should reach the temperature which lignin decomposes strongly at releasing heat violently. Carbonization temperature should be higher than 450 °C. Besides, biomass average heating rate shouldn’t be too high and it should be under 20 °C /min.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 634-638)

Pages:

759-763

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Gengfu Fu: Nanjing forestry university, MsD. 2009 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Kaifeng Zhao: Nanjing forestry university, MsD. 2009 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] C. A Koufopanos, N. Papayannakos, G. Maschio and A. Lucchesi: Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. Vol. 69 (1991), p.907.

Google Scholar

[4] R. K. Jalan and V. K. Srivastava: Energy Conversion and Management. Vol. 40 (1999), p.467.

Google Scholar

[5] B . V . Babu and A. S . Chaurasia: Energy Conversion and Management. Vol. 44(2003), p.2251.

Google Scholar

[6] P. O. Okekunle, T . Pattanotai, H . Watanabe and K. Okazaki: Journal of Thermal Science and Technology. Vol. 6(2011), p.360.

Google Scholar

[7] J. M. Mesa-Perez, L. A. B . Cortez, J. D . Rocha, L.E. Brossard-Perezc and E. Olivares-Gomezb: Fuel Processing Technology. Vol. 86(2005), p.567.

Google Scholar

[8] Yimin Wu, Zengli Zhao, Haibin Li and Fang He: Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology. Vol. 37(2009), p.427 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Hong Tan, Shurong Wang , Zhongyang Luo and Kefa Cen: Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology. Vol. 34(2006), p.61 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] J . Rath, M. G . Wolfinger, G. Steiner, G. Krammera, F. Barontinib and V. Cozzani: Fuel. Vol. 82(2003), p.81.

Google Scholar

[11] Na Huang: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, MsD. 2007 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] H . Haykiri-Acma, S . Yaman and S . Kucukbayrak: Fuel Processing Technology. Vol. 91(2010), p.759.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.02.009

Google Scholar

[13] T. R. Brown, M .M. Wright and R .C. Brown: Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining. Vol. 5(2011), p.54.

Google Scholar

[14] W. C. Park, A. Atreya and H .R. Baum: Combustion and Flame. Vol. 157(2010), p.485.

Google Scholar