Trend Assessment of Safety Management Status of Bridge Construction

Article Preview

Abstract:

Trend assessment of safety management status described the variation of the safe state during the process of construction, and it is an early warning of safe accidents to some extent. So the study of it is becoming a burning question. Aim at the uncertainty and the dynamic characteristics of the system; the trend assessment model of bridge construction safety management status has been set up using the theory set-pair analysis and Markov chain. The application results show that this model can predict the safety management status of the next and final stage relatively accurately, and it can play a guiding role in preventing safety accidents.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 639-640)

Pages:

1321-1326

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wang Xingchong. Evaluation Method Design of Safety Management Status and the Practice [J]. Industrial Safety and Dust Control,2005,31(8):55.

Google Scholar

[2] Liu Yejiao,Tian Zhichao etc. Evaluation of Modern Safety Management Performance in Coal Mine [J]. Coal Engineering,2009, (11):119-120.

Google Scholar

[3] Gao Xiaoxu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Safety Management in Coal Mine [J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2007,34(5):83-84.

Google Scholar

[4] Aneziris O N,Papazoglou l A,Lygerou V. Dyniamic safety analysis of process systems with an application to a cryogenic ammonia storage tank[J]. Journal of Lass Prevention in the Process Industries,2000,13(2):153-165.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-4230(99)00060-1

Google Scholar

[5] Zhao Lifeng,Zhao Keqin. The theories, methods and its applications of set pair analysis, system science and it's applications. Tianjin: Peoples'Publishing House, 1998, 61-64.

Google Scholar

[6] Curnow R N. The use of Makov chain models in studing the evolution of the protains[J].J. Theor Biol, 1988, 134: 51-57.

Google Scholar

[7] Song Lianjun,Xu Zhiyong. Assessment of power customer credit risk based on set pair analysis and Markov chain model [J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment,2009, 29(12):38-39.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhou Jiahong,Xu Kaili,Chen Zhiyong. On the Dynamic Assessment of System Safety [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science),2008, 29(3):417-419.

Google Scholar

[9] Randall S. Harper and Enno Koehn. Managing industrial construction safety in southeast Texas[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Managemeng, 1998, (6): 452-457.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1998)124:6(452)

Google Scholar

[10] Joe M. Wilson Jr, Enno Koehn. Safety managemeng problems encountered and recommended solutions[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Managemeng, 2000, 126(1): 77-79.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2000)126:1(77)

Google Scholar