Study on the Double-Fined Treatment and Superplasticity of GCr15 Die Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

Heat treatment has a signifieant impact on the performance of the GCr15 die steel. Using scanning electron microscopy, optical microscopy, hardness tester and tensile testing machine analyses the influence of double-fined treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of GCr15 steels. The results show that the double-fined treatment can make the carbids which haven’t insoluted fine to 320nm and the grains fine to No. 10. The dislocated martensite become more after double-fined treatment; at the same time, there are more sheet-retained austernite in lathy martensite and around sheet martensite; broken-orifice changes from definitely cleavage brittleness fracture to definitely cleavage tenacity fracture. By double-fined treatment, die steel can be given the neeessary strength and toughness, and the life can be substantially increased. The superplasticity of GCr15 die steel was improved by double-fined treatment. The optimal temperature range of the elongation is: 680~780°C. Anti-oxidants can improve the elongation of GCr15 steels.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

356-361

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Qi Z F, Wang Y Z. Duplex refining process of bearing steel[J]. Mater Design, 2008, 29: 1330.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhou L R, Peng P, Liao P B. Double-fined Treatment on Cold-Punching DiesMade of GCr15 Steel[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2004, 24-25: 10.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhao Y M, Mou Y W. Study on Solution and Double-refine Treatment of Cr12MoV Steel[J]. Material&Heat Treatment, 2008, 75: 37.

Google Scholar

[4] Li G B, Li X Z. Study of the thermal fatigue craek initial life of H13 and H21 Steels [J]. Journal of Materials Proeessing Teehnology, 1998, 74: 23-30.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(97)00244-6

Google Scholar

[5] Horita Z, Langdon T G. Achieving exceptional superplasticity in a bulk aluminum alloy processed by high-pressure torsion[J]. Scripta Mater, 2008, 58: 1029.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.043

Google Scholar

[6] Ryspaev T, TrojanováZ, Padalka O, et al. Microstructure of superplastic QE22 and EZ33 magnesium alloys[J]. Mater Lett, 2008, 62: 4041.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.05.063

Google Scholar

[7] Wang G C, Fu M W. Maximum m superplasticity deformation for Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy[J]. J Mater Proc Techn, 2007, 192-193: 555.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.059

Google Scholar

[8] Musin F, Kaibyshev R, Motohashi Y, et al. High strain rate superplasticity in a commercial Al-Mg-Sc alloy [J]. Scripta Mater, 2004, 50: 511.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.10.021

Google Scholar

[9] Lee J H, Song Y J, Shin D H, et al. Microstructural evolution during superplastic bulge forming of Ti-6Al-4V alloy[J]. Mater Sci Eng A, 1998, 243: 119.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00788-0

Google Scholar

[10] Nazzal M A, Khraisheh M K, Abu-Farha F K. The effect of strain rate sensitivity evolution on deformation stability during superplastic forming[J]. J Mater Proc Techn, 2007, 191: 189.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.097

Google Scholar

[11] Sergueeva A V, Mara N A, Valiev R Z, et al. Elevated temperature behavior of SePD materials: Superplasticity or enhanced ductility[J]. Mater Sci Eng A, 2005, 410-411: 413.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.020

Google Scholar

[12] Giuliano G. Constitutive equation for superplastic Ti-6Al-4V alloy[J]. Mater Design, 2008, 29: 1330.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.07.001

Google Scholar