Effect of Quartz Sand Coated with Water-Treatment Residuals as Arsenic Adsorbent

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, quartz sand coated with water-treatment residuals was tested for its effectiveness as an arsenic adsorbent. The surface characteristics of the quartz sand before and after modification were analyzed. Different amounts of modified quartz sand were then tested for their adsorption capacity, using raw water with an arsenic concentration of 500 ppb. Analysis showed that the surface area and average pore diameter of the quartz sand had increased significantly after modification, as did the amounts of iron, manganese, and aluminum found as surface elements. Using both Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models to measure the effectiveness of arsenic adsorption by the modified quartz sand, it was found that the latter model, for monolayer adsorption, was more appropriate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1064-1069

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Cotruvo, J. A., Vogt, C. O. (1990) Rationale for water quality standard and goals, In Water Quality and Trearment, 4thed. By Pontius, F., American Water Works Association.

Google Scholar

[2] Lin, M.C., Liao, C.M., Liu, C.W., and Singh, S. (2001) Bioaccumulation of arsenic in aquacultural large-scale mullet Liza macrolepis from the blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 67: 91-97.

DOI: 10.1007/s001280095

Google Scholar

[3] O'Connor, J. T(2002) Arsenic in drinking water Part2: Human exposure and health effects. Water Eng. Manag. 149, 35-37.

Google Scholar

[4] World Health Organization. (2000) Environmental health criteria: arsenic Geneva: World Health Organization.

Google Scholar

[5] Mohan, D., Singh, K.P. (2002) Single- `and Multi- component adsorption of cadmium and zinc using activated carbon derived from bagasse-an agricultural waste. Water Res. 36, 2304-2318.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00447-x

Google Scholar

[6] Makris, K.C., Sarkar, D. and Datta, R. (2006) Evaluating a drinking-water waste by-product as a novel sorbent for arsenic. Chemosphere, 64(5), 730-741.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.054

Google Scholar

[7] Chwirka, J.D., Thomson, B.M. and Stomp, J.M. (2000) Removing arsenic from groundwater. Journal American Water Works Association, 92(3), 79-88.

DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb08911.x

Google Scholar

[8] Wickramasinghe, S.R., Han, B.B., Zimbron, J., Shen, Z. and Karim, M.N. (2004) Arsenic removal by coagulation and filtration: comparison of groundwaters from the United States and Bangladesh. Desalination, 169(3), 231-244.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(04)00530-2

Google Scholar