Examination and Evaluation of WRF in Floods Season Precipitation Forecast of Jintan

Ling Ling Huang; Wen Bin Wang; He Ming Li; Hong  Qian; Lu Hao

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.663.743

Paper Titles

Research on Thermal Optimal Operation Scheduling of Multi-Heat Source Co-Heating System
p.717

Adaptive Resource Allocation for the Multi-User Multi-Carrier Networks
p.722

Solid Distribution in Clarifier Blanket: Numerical Modeling and Experimental Measurement
p.729

Leaf Nutrient Resorption of Seagrass Zostera japonica Aschers. et Graebn. in Beihai, Guangxi, China
p.736

Examination and Evaluation of WRF in Floods Season Precipitation Forecast of Jintan
p.743

Isolation, Characterization of a Candida Strain Capable Degrading of Dyes 4,5-Diamino-1-Pyrazole Sulfate
p.749

Research and Application of Tapping Potential Remaining Oil of Low Permeability Reservoir in Hei47 Block, Jilin Oilfield
p.753

Printing Industry and the Environment
p.759

Material Form and Nature of Breadth Space Resources
p.763

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 663Examination and Evaluation of WRF in Floods Season...

Examination and Evaluation of WRF in Floods Season Precipitation Forecast of Jintan

Abstract:

The WRF V2 model was examined and evaluated in the precipitation forecast of Jintan from May to September in 2008 using daily precipitation forecast of product information. through test and analysis to the forecast of single point precipitation. The results show that: (1) the precipitation forecast accuracy rate of each month of the single point (55%-75%) is about 10% lower than the regional (65% -85%). (2) the WRF V2 model has a moderate precipitation forecast accuracy rate (75%) for the rain or shine, moderate rain and less precipitation. However, when forecasting heavy rain and more precipitation, the model’s capability is weak. (3) the model has a higher probability of empty forecast (above 60%), and a lower probability of omission forecast. With the increase of the precipitation level, the empty rate reduced while the omission rate increased. (4) The stage precipitation forecast effect of 24h is better than 12h, namely, the forecast period is the longer, the smaller the error of the actual situations in precipitation, and the better effect of the simulation of the model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Health, Structure, Material and Environment

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 663)

Pages:

743-748

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.663.743

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2013

Authors:

Ling Ling Huang, Wen Bin Wang, He Ming Li, Hong Qian, Lu Hao

Keywords:

Evaluation, Examination, Jintan, Numerical Modeling, WRF

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] G . Rasul, Q.Z. Chaudhry, S.X. Zhao, et al: Adv Atmos Sci. Vol. 22(3) (2005). P, 375-391.

Google Scholar

[2] J.F. Gu, Q. N. Xiao, Y. H. Kuo, et al: Adv Atmos Sci. Vol. 22(3) (2002), pp.415-427.

Google Scholar

[3] J.Z. Hou, Z.Q. Ning: Journal of Shanxi Meteorological. Vol. 1 (2006), pp.22-26.

Google Scholar

[4] G.Y. Wu, Yellow, D.H. Chen: Chinese Journal of Meteorological Science. Vol. 28(5), (2008) pp.494-501.

Google Scholar

[5] X. Duan; WangMan; Rosen, et al: Chinese Journal of weather. Vol. 37(1), (2011) pp.39-47.

Google Scholar

[6] F.H. Zhang, X.L. Ma, K.M. Yang: Chinese Journal of Weather. Vol. 430(1), (2004) pp.28-32.

Google Scholar

[7] J.S. Wei, T.B. Dodson, Y. Sun et al: Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Science. Vol. 34(2), (2011) pp.232-238.

Google Scholar