Comparative Research for Different Treatment Technologies of Daily Drinking Water

Abstract:

The research takes Yang Liuqing water plant as an example.Compare the studies of the conventional process, coagulation pressure type membrane process, coagulation submerged membrane process between removal efficiency and water production rate.The result shows the removal efficiency of raw water turbidity and oxygen consumption had an increase of 7% and 4% than the conventional process. Disposable water production rate increased by 1%-2%.Meanwhile combined with other influence factors,a analytic hierarchy model has been established. From the two aspects of cost and benefit,compare comprehensively different process.The result shows that coagulation - immersed membrane process is more suitable drinking water treatment technology for water purification operation in water purification plant.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 663)
• Pages: 863-869
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.663.863
• Online since: February 2013
• Authors: Cheng Li, Ting Lin Huang, Wen Jie He, Chen Li, Zhi Wei Li
• Keywords: Conventional Process, Pressure Type Membrane, Submerged Membrane Process, Water Treatment

References

[1] Cartwright P. The role of membrane technology in water purification applications. Filtration Sep. 1997, 34(6): 564-567.

[2] Guigui C, Rouch J C, Durand-Bourlier L, et al. Impact of coagulation conditions on the in-line coagulation/UF process for drinking water production[J]. Desalination, 2002, (147): 95-100.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00582-9

[3] Pry or M J, Jacobs E P, Botes J P, et al. A low pressure ultrafiltration membrane system for potable water supply to developing communities in South Africa. Desalination, 1998, 119: 103-111.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(98)00126-x

[4] Defrance C, Jaffirin M. Y. Comparison between filtration at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux: application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatmen t [J]. J. Mem. Sci., 1999, 152: 203-210.

DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(98)00220-8

[5] Xia Shengji, Nan Jun, Liu Rui-ping, et al. Study of drinking water treatment by ultrafiltration of surface water and its application to China[J]. Desalination, 2004, 170(1): 41-47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.03.014

[6] Childress Amy E., Elimelech Menachem. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1996, 119(2): 253-268.

DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(96)00127-5

[7] Lin Bin, Zeng Cui-lin, Xiang Mei-zhou. Evaluation of urban water safrty based on analytic hierarchy proess[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 2012, 24(1): 59-63.