Catalytic Conversion of Tar Compounds from Biomass over Modified Ni/Olivine Catalysts

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigated the improving catalytic effects during tar catalytic reforming by impregnated NiO and CeO2 onto olivine, and the further reduction of carbon deposition on the catalysts was achieving by the addition of MgO. A series of characters of the catalysts were tested by XRD, TPR and TPD. The experimental results showed the addition of MgO could improve the resistance to carbon deposition and had demonstrated higher reaction activity at higher temperature and lower water-carbon ratio. The activities of catalysts were not only related to the impregnating order of the promoters NiO and CeO2 but also to the water (steam)-carbon ratio (S/C). Those catalysts impregnated Mg, Ce and Ni in order could achieve highly disperse sites and further promote the interaction between active sites and carriers. Furthermore, those catalysts also had higher reaction activity and better anti-coking abilities under low water (steam)-carbon ratios.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

67-75

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Corella, A. Orio, P. Aznar, Biomass gasification with air in fluidized bed: Reforming of the gas composition with commercial steam reforming catalysts, Ind Eng Chem Res, 37 (1998) (12) : 4617- 4624.

DOI: 10.1021/ie980254h

Google Scholar

[2] P. Nader, W. Wang, Z. Ye, et al. Tar formation in pressurized fluidized bed air gasification of woody biomass, Energy & Fuels, , 14 (2000) (3): 603-611.

DOI: 10.1021/ef990185z

Google Scholar

[3] A. S. Pekka, Jukka K L, Bredenberg J B. Catalytic purification of tarry fuel gas with carbonate Rocks and Ferrous Materials, Fuel, , 71 (1992) 211-218.

DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(92)90011-c

Google Scholar

[4] A. C. Miguel, Corella J, Aznar M P, et al. Biomass gasification with air in fluidized bed. hot gas cleanup with selected commercial and full-size nickel-based catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res, 39 (2000), 1143-1154.

DOI: 10.1021/ie990738t

Google Scholar

[5] P.A. Simell, J.O. Hepola, A.O.I. Krause, Effects of gasification gas components on tar and ammonia decomposition over hot gas cleanup catalysts, Fuel, 76 (1997) 1117.

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(97)00109-9

Google Scholar

[6] P.A. Simell, E.K. Hirvensalo, V.T. Smolander, Steam reforming of gasification gas tar over dolomite with benzene as a model compound, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38 (1999) 1250.

DOI: 10.1021/ie980646o

Google Scholar

[7] R. Coll, J. Salvado, X. Farriol, D. Montane, Steam reforming model compounds of biomass gasification tars: Conversion at different operating conditions and tendency towards coke formation, Fuel Process Technology, 74 (2001) 19.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(01)00214-4

Google Scholar

[8] D. Swierczynski, Claire Courson, Alain Kiennemann, Study of steam reforming of toluene used as model compound of tar produced by biomass gasification, Chemical Engineering and Processing 47 (2008) 508–513.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2007.01.012

Google Scholar

[9] C. Li, Daisuke Hirabayashi, Kenzi Suzuki, Development of new nickel based catalyst for biomass tar steam reforming producing H2-rich syngas, Fuel Processing Technology 90 (2009) 790–796.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.02.007

Google Scholar

[10] Takeshi Furusawa, Yasutomo Miura, Yoshihiko Kori, et al, The cycle usage test of Ni/MgO catalyst for the steam reforming of Naphthalene/Benzene as model tar compounds of biomass gasification, Catalysis Communications 10 (2009) 552–556.

DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2008.10.032

Google Scholar

[11] Takeshi Furusawaa, Atsushi Tsutsumi, Comparison of Co/MgO and Ni/MgO catalysts for the steam reforming of naphthalene as a model compound of tar derived from biomass gasification, Applied Catalysis A: General 278 (2005) 207–212.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.09.035

Google Scholar

[12] D. Swierczynski, C. Courson, A. Kiennemann, Study of steam reforming of toluene used as model compound of tar produced by biomass gasication, Chem. Eng. Process. 47 (2008) 508-513.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2007.01.012

Google Scholar

[13] D. Sutton, B. Kelleher, R.H. Ross, Review of literature on catalysts for biomass gasification, Fuel Process Technology. 73 (2001) 155–173.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(01)00208-9

Google Scholar

[14] K.A. Magrini-Bair, S. Czernik, R. French, Y.O. Parent, et al, Fluidizable reforming catalyst development for conditioning biomass derived syngas, Appl. Catal., A. 318 (2007) 199–206.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.11.005

Google Scholar

[15] L. Devi, K. J. Ptasinski, F. J. J. G. Janssen, A review of the primary measures for tar elimination in biomass gasification processes, Biomass and Bioenergy, 24 (2003) 125-140.

DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00102-2

Google Scholar

[16] A. Donnot, P. Magne, X. Deglise, Experimental approach to the catalysed cracking reaction of tar from wood pyrolysis, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 21 (1991) 265.

DOI: 10.1016/0165-2370(91)80002-p

Google Scholar

[17] J. Delgado, M.P. Aznar, J. Corella, Calcined dolomite, magnesite, and calcite for cleaning hot Gas from a fluidized bed biomass gasifier with steam: life and usefulness, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35 (1996) 3637.

DOI: 10.1021/ie950714w

Google Scholar

[18] M.P. Aznar, J. Corella, J. Delgado, J. Lahoz, Improved steam gasification of lignocellulosic residues in a fluidized-bed with commercial steam reforming catalysts, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 32 (1993) 1.

DOI: 10.1021/ie00013a001

Google Scholar

[19] I. Narva´ez, J. Corella, A. Orı´o, Fresh tar (from a biomass gasifier) elimination over a commercial steam-reforming catalyst. Kinetics and effect of different variables of operation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (1997) 317.

DOI: 10.1021/ie960235c

Google Scholar

[20] M.P. Caballero, M.P. Aznar, J. Gil, et al, Commercial steam reforming catalysts to improve biomass gasification with steam-oxygen mixtures. 1. hot gas upgrading by the catalytic reactor, Chem. Res. 36 (1997) 5227.

DOI: 10.1021/ie970149s

Google Scholar

[21] M.P. Aznar, M.A. Caballero, J. Gil, et al, Commercial steam reforming catalysts to improve biomass gasification with steam-oxygen mixtures. 2. catalytic tar removal, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37 (1998) 2668.

DOI: 10.1021/ie9706727

Google Scholar

[22] J. Corella, A. Orı´o, J. -M. Toledo, Biomass gasification with air in a fluidized bed: Exhaustive tar elimination with commercial steam reforming catalysts, Energy and Fuels, 13 (1999) 702.

DOI: 10.1021/ef980221e

Google Scholar

[23] S. Rapagna´, H. Provendier, C. Petit, et al, Development of catalysts suitable for hydrogen or syn-gas production from biomass gasification, Biomass and Bioenergy, 22 (2002) 377.

DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00011-9

Google Scholar

[24] J. Arauzo, D. Radlein, J. Piskorz, et al, Catalytic pyrogasification of biomass. evaluation of modified nickel catalysts, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (1997) 67.

DOI: 10.1021/ie950271w

Google Scholar

[25] S. Czernik, R. French, C. Feik, E. Chornet, Hydrogen by Catalytic steam reforming of liquid byproducts from biomass thermoconversion processes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41 (2002) 4209–4215.

DOI: 10.1021/ie020107q

Google Scholar

[26] M. Marquevich, S. Czernik, E. Chornet, D. Montane´, Hydrogen from biomass: Steam reforming of model compounds of fast pyrolysis oil, Energy Fuels 13 (1999) 1160–1166.

DOI: 10.1021/ef990034w

Google Scholar

[27] D.N. Bangala, N. Abatzoglou, J.P. Martin, E. Chornet, Kinetics of oxidation of ammonia in solutions containing ozone with or without hydrogen peroxide, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (1997) 4184–4192.

DOI: 10.1021/ie960785a

Google Scholar

[28] T. Yamaguchi, K. Yamasaki, O. Yoshida, et al, Deactivation and regeneration of catalyst for steam gasification of wood to methanol synthesis gas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 25 (2) (1986) 239–243.

DOI: 10.1021/i300022a019

Google Scholar

[29] L. Garcia, R. French, S. Czernik, E. Chornet, Catalytic steam reforming of bio-oils for the production of hydrogen: Effects of catalyst composition, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 201 (2000) 225–239.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-860x(00)00440-3

Google Scholar

[30] D.N. Bangala, N. Abatzoglou, E. Chornet, Steam reforming of naphthalene on Ni-Cr/Al2O3 catalysts doped with MgO, TiO2 and La2O3, AIChE J. 44 (1998) 927–936.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690440418

Google Scholar

[31] C. Petit, A. Kiennemann, P. Chaumette, et, al, Oxidation catalyst and process for the partial oxidation of methane, US Patent No. 5, 447, 705 (1995).

Google Scholar

[32] T. Hayakawa, H. Harihara, A.G. Andersen, et al, Sustainable Ni/Ca1−xSrxTiO3 catalyst prepared in situ for the partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas, Appl. Catal. A 149 (1997) 391.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-860x(96)00274-8

Google Scholar

[33] H. Provendier, C. Petit, C. Estournès, et al, Stabilization of active Nickel catalysts in partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas by iron addition, Appl. Catal. A 180 (1999) 163.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-860x(98)00343-3

Google Scholar

[34] R. Zhang, Y. Wang, R. C. Brown, Steam reforming of tar compounds over Ni/olivine catalysts doped with CeO2, Energy Conversion and Management, 48 (2007) 68–77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2006.05.001

Google Scholar

[35] K. Tomishige, T. Kimura, J. Nishikawa, et al, Promoting on steam gasication of biomass, effect of the interaction between Ni and CeO2 , Catal. Commun. 8 (2007) 1074 -1079.

DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.05.051

Google Scholar

[36] A. Guerrero-Ruiz, A. Sepulveda-Eseribano, Rodriguez-Ramos, Cooperative action of cobalt and MgO for the catalysed reforming of CH4 with CO2, Catal Today, 21 (1994) 545.

DOI: 10.1016/0920-5861(94)80178-9

Google Scholar

[37] C. Courson, L. Udron, C. Petit, Grafted NiO on natural olivine for dry reforming of methane, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 3 (2002) 271–282.

DOI: 10.1016/s1468-6996(02)00026-8

Google Scholar

[38] L. FU, S. LU, W. XIE, et al, Effect of Basic Promotors on the Performance of Ni/CaO-Al2O3 Catalysts, Journal of Molecular Catalysis (China), 14 (2000) 3: 179-183.

Google Scholar