Pavement Performance of Low Dosage Cement Stabilized Gravel Powder Mixed with Aggregates

Article Preview

Abstract:

On the basis of test analysis, mix design of cement stabilized gravel powder, cement stabilized gravel powder mixed with 20% aggregates and cement stabilized gravel powder mixed with 40% aggregates were compared, their unconfined compressive strength were tested, and the mixed aggregates ratio and mix design were ultimately determined. The experimental results show that mixing a certain amount of aggregate can reduce cement dose and meet the design strength. Engineering project cost by mixing with a certain amount of aggregate was little higher than that of cement stabilized gravel powder. Comprehensively considering technical and economic factors, the recommended amount of aggregates mixed with 30% and cement dose of 2%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

48-52

Citation:

Online since:

March 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] YU Xin, HUANG Xiao-ming Analysis on Shrinkage and Temperature Contraction Character for Low Dosage Cement Stabilized Aggregate. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development. 2007. 24(7): 52-55.

Google Scholar

[2] AO Dao-chao . Application of Low Content Cement Stabilized Gravel to Yu-Zhan Expressway. HIGHWAY Jul. 2006 NO. 7.

Google Scholar

[3] BAI Qi-feng, LIU lin, HU Wu-sheng. Analysis on Performance for Low Dosage Cement Stabilized Aggregate. Journal of China & Foreign Highway. 2006. 26(12):170-173.

Google Scholar

[4] JTGD50-2006 . Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement.

Google Scholar

[5] JTJ 034-2000. Technical Specifications for Construction of Highway Roadbases.

Google Scholar

[6] Seungwook Lim, Dan G. Zollinger. Estimation of the Compressive Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Cement-Treated Aggregate Base Materials[C]. TRB 2003 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Transportations Research Board Washington, D. C.

DOI: 10.3141/1837-04

Google Scholar