Study on Institutions of Higher Learning Mechanical Engineering Training Evaluation Indicator System

Abstract:

This paper presents a set of evaluation indicator system for Institutions of higher learning mechanical engineering training. In this way, we can effectively solve the difficulties of the mechanical engineering training examination work at present. The evaluation indicator system was established in the method of AHP, which is a kind of qualitative and quantitative, systematic, hierarchical analysis method. On the basis of the practical problems in-depth analysis of mechanical engineering training and assessment, we first established a three-level structure model of the indictor system. The top level of the model is target layer. Then we constructed the weight judgment matrix of the hierarchical model, and deduced the indictors’ weight consistency checking algorithm, and finally arrived at the formula of the evaluation results.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 677)
• Pages: 558-562
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.677.558
• Online since: March 2013
• Authors: Xiao Chun Yin, Lin Lin Li, Yu Jun Yin, Xiao He Luo
• Keywords: Higher learning, Indicator System, Mechanical Engineering, Training evaluation

References

[1] Rebecca M Slayton and Keith A Nelson. Opening Lab Doors to High School Students: Key to a Successful Engagement [J]. PHYSICS EDUCATION, 2005, 40(4): 347.

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9120/40/4/004

[2] KaPlan R.S. and D.P. Norton. Putting the Balanced Scorecard the Work [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993, 74(1): 75.

[3] Alan Butler, Steve R. Letza and Bill Neale. Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy [J]. Long Range Planning, 1997, 30: 242.

DOI: 10.1016/s0024-6301(96)00116-1

[4] Zaden L.A. Fuzzy Sets and Systems [J]. Information and Control, 8(3): 29.