Amalgamated Criticality Analysis Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

Failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) is a widely useful design tool for enhancing product quality, safety and reliability. Most of the current FMECA procedure is in accordance with MIL-STD-1629A by which to conduct FMECA and criticality analysis, which is able to prioritize the failure modes and undertake limited corrective actions toward eliminating product risks. However, the criticality analysis calculation and its interpretation for a failure mode have some mathematical difficulties and erroneous omissions. To resolve these problems, this study proposes a new amalgamated criticality analysis methodology, which is knowledge-based to obtain the four different factor criteria and then using the maximal entropy ordered weighted geometric averaging (ME-OWGA) approach to compute the criticality numbers for a system. This study evaluates criticality analysis in the context of a communication system; the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is both accurate and provides discriminating analysis information that helps decision making in product design processes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

101-106

Citation:

Online since:

April 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Department of Defense of USA: MIL-STD-1629A, Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis, (1984).

Google Scholar

[2] Ford Motor Company: Potential failure mode and effects analysis in design (Design FMECA) and for manufacturing and assembly processes (Process FMECA) reference manual, (1988).

DOI: 10.4271/j1739_200006

Google Scholar

[3] C.S. Liaw, Y.C. Chang, K.H. Chang and T.Y. Chang: ME-OWA based DEMATEL reliability apportionment method. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38 (2011), p.9713–9723.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.029

Google Scholar

[4] A.S. Agarwala: Shortcoming in MIL-STD-1629A guidelines for criticality analysis, Processing Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, (1990), pp.494-496.

DOI: 10.1109/arms.1990.68007

Google Scholar

[5] J.B. Bowles: The new SAE FMECA standard, Processing Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, (1998), pp.48-53.

DOI: 10.1109/rams.1998.653561

Google Scholar

[6] J. Aczel, and T.L. Saaty: Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27(1), (1983), pp.93-102.

Google Scholar

[7] R.R. Yager: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 18 (1) (1988), p.183–190.

DOI: 10.1109/21.87068

Google Scholar

[8] M. O'Hagan: Aggregating template or rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic. (Proceedings of 22nd Annual IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, (1988), p.681–689.

DOI: 10.1109/acssc.1988.754637

Google Scholar

[9] R. Fuller and P. Majlender: An analytic approach for obtaining maximal entropy OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 124 (1), (2001), p.53–57.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(01)00007-0

Google Scholar