Mechanical Properties of Homogenous and Heterogeneous Three Layered Particleboard Composite in Relation on Different Resin Content

Article Preview

Abstract:

Two types of three layered particleboard composite, homogeneous (Acacia mangium core-face/back) and heterogeneous (Acacia mangium core, mixed sawdust face/back) were fabricated with three different resin contents and densities. Three different resin content; 8:10:8, 10:10:10 and 12:10:12, were use with 500, 600 and 700kg/m3 board densities. Urea Formaldehyde (UF) was used as a binder and 1% of wax was added. The properties of bending strength (MOR & MOE) and internal bond strength (IB) were evaluated based on Japanese Industrial Standard; JIS A 5908:2003 Particleboard (2003). The results showed that there were relationship between resin contents and densities on homogeneous and heterogeneous particleboard composites. Result obtained indicated that bending and internal bond strength of homogeneous composite bonded using ratio of 12:10:12 resin content with 700kg/m3 density was better compared to ratio of 8:10:8 and 10:10:10 resin contents. When the densities were increased, the mechanical properties also increased.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

637-640

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.Zaini, Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: solution for sustainable waste management, J. Applied Sciences in Environmental Sanitation, 6 (1), (2011):29-38.

Google Scholar

[2] N. Gamage, S. Setunge, M. Jollanda and J. Hague, Properties of hardwood sawmill residue-based particleboards as affected by processing parameters, Ind Crop Prod 29 (2009), p.248–254 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.05.012

Google Scholar

[3] W.T. Wan Ariffin, H.Wan Samsi, and P.Elham,Management of wood waste from the wood processing industry. FRIM Technical Information Handbook No. 22, 1999.

Google Scholar

[4] J.A. Youngquist, Wood-based composites and panel products in wood handbook: wood as an engineering material, Gen. Tech. Rept. FPL-GRT-113., USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab, Madison, WI, 1999, p.1–31.

DOI: 10.2737/fpl-gtr-113

Google Scholar

[5] P.Manisara, S.Puriphat, C.Suradet, S.Ruangdet, P.Nikorn, V.Leartprakit, T.Apichate, and S.Pitt, Isotactic poly(propylene)/wood sawdust composite: effects of natural weathering, water immersion, and gamma-ray irradiation on mechanical properties, Wiley-Vch Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim (2008).

DOI: 10.1002/masy.200850410

Google Scholar

[6] C.M.S. Joa˜o,. M.B.C. Fernanda, and H.S. Thaı´s, SEM studies of tensile fracture surfaces of polypropylene-sawdust composites, J. Polymer Testing, Brazil, 2003, 22:819–824.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9418(03)00017-5

Google Scholar

[7] G.Tsoumis, Science and technology of wood; structure, properties and utilization, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 115 Fifth Avenue, New York, TA419.T77 (1991).

Google Scholar