Experimental Study on Welding Fumes Exposure from Aluminum Metal Inert Gas (MIG) Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Welding fumes are known as hazard that can cause acute health effects. Welders exposures to welding fumes are oftentimes difficult to evaluate due to the different parameters settings exist in their workplace. Therefore, this experimental study focused on welding fumes exposure towards aluminum metal inert gas (MIG) welders. The experimental set-up was done by using a dummy welder and a welding machine attached to Computer Numerical Control (CNC) workbench for programmable welding route. This preliminary experiment aims at comparing results between scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), inductively coupled mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) analysis method. New insight on the consistency of the SEM-EDS experimental results, comparison of element detected by using SEM-EDS and ICP-MS result analysis and the different elements detected between standing and sitting welding position were recognized through this preliminary experimental study. It is concluded that SEM-EDS analysis are not suitable to be used as a preliminary analysis to shortlist the metal elements exists in the welding fumes sample due to the misleading results if compared to the elemental characterization measure proportional to the atomic number such as ICP-MS.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

382-386

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. S. Ashby, Welding fumes in the workplace: Preventing potential health problems through proactive controls, Professional Safety (2002), pp.55-60.

Google Scholar

[2] S. R. Fiore, Reducing exposure to hexavalent chromium in welding fumes, Welding Journal (2006), pp.38-43.

Google Scholar

[3] E.Ravert,Controlling Chromium Fumes, Welding Journal (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] N. Mansouri, F. Atbi, N. Moharamnezhad, D. A. Rahbaran, and M. Alahiari, Gravimetric and analytical evaluation of welding fume in an automobile part manufacturing factory, J.Res. Health Sci. 8 (2008) pp.1-8.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Blunt and N. C. Balchin, Health and Safety in Welding and Allied Processes. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] P. J. Hewitt, Strategies for risk assesment and control in welding: challenges for developing countries, Ann. Occup.Hyg. Vol 45, 4, (2001) pp.295-298.

Google Scholar

[7] N. T. Jenkins and T. W. Eager, Chemical analysis of welding fume particles, Welding Journal (2005), pp.87-93.

Google Scholar

[8] Department of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia (DOSH), Guidelines on Monitoring of Airborne Contaminant for Chemicals Hazardous to Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, (2005).

Google Scholar

[9] Azian Hariri, A. M. Leman and M.Z.M. Yusof, Application of Malaysian anthropometric data in dummy welder design, in Proc. International Conference of Design and Concurrent Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Malaysia (2012).

DOI: 10.15282/jmes.11.3.2017.4.0255

Google Scholar

[10] J. M. Antonini, A. A. Afshari, S. Stone, B. Chen, D. Schwegler-Berry, W. G. Fletcher, W. T. Goldsmith, K. H. Vandestouwe, W. Mckinney, W. Castranova, and D. G. Frazer, Design, construction, and characterization of a novel robotic welding fume generator and inhalation exposure system for laboratory animals, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol 3, 4 (2006): 194-203.

DOI: 10.1080/15459620600584352

Google Scholar

[11] Elements by ICP. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods 7303 (2003).

Google Scholar