The Optimization Design of Dental Implant after the Mandible Tumor Resection and Reconstruction

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mandible defect and the lack of dentition may result in facial deformity and chewing organ defects. It happens after the surgery of oral and maxillofacial tumors. This study aims at this problem. In this study, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was employed to reconstruct the implanted mandible for customized patient. The 3D FEA model has great importance for biomechanical analysis. Though the analysis of the biomechanical situation with different numbers of dental implants, we can optimize the location and quantity of the implants. In this way, we can improve the quality of the implants, reduce the pain of patients, reduce the operation cost and avoid secondary surgery.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

318-322

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. L. Sun, C. Huang, Y. R. Wu et al., Dental Implants and Factors Influencing Their Failure: A Systematic Review. International J. of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 26(2011) 816-825.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Esposito, L. Murray-Curtis, M. G. Grusovin et al., Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 4(2007) CD003815.

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003815.pub3

Google Scholar

[3] E. E. Machtei, D. Mahler, O. Oettinger-Barak et al., Dental implants placed in previously failed sites: survival rate and factors affecting the outcome. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 19(2008) 259-264.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01466.x

Google Scholar

[4] J.P. Fiorellini, D. Buser, D.W. Paquette et al., A radiographic evaluation of bone healing around submerged and non-submerged dental implants in beagle dogs. Journal of Periodontology. 70(1999) 248-254.

DOI: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.3.248

Google Scholar

[5] A. A. Balshe, D. A. Assad, S. E. Eckert et al., A Retrospective Study of the Survival of Smooth- and Rough-Surface Dental Implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Impalnts. 24(2009) 1113-1118.

Google Scholar

[6] S.D. Ferreira, L.A. Esper, M.C. Sbrana, I.W.J. Ribeiro, A.L.P.F. de Almeida, Survival of Dental Implants in the Cleft Area-A Retrospective Study. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 47(2010) 586-590.

DOI: 10.1597/08-155

Google Scholar

[7] D. Cardaropoli, L. Gaveglio, Supportive periodontal therapy and dental implants: an analysis of patients' compliance. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 23(2012) 1385-1388.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02316.x

Google Scholar

[8] P. Vaz, M.M. Gallas, A.C. Braga, J.C. Sampaio-Fernandes, A. Felino, P. Tavares, IL1 gene polymorphisms and unsuccessful dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 23(2012) 1404-1413.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02322.x

Google Scholar

[9] M. C. Goiato, D. M. dos Santos, A. A. Pesqueira et al, Hyperbaric oxygen therapy treatment for the fixation of implant prosthesis in oncology patients irradiated. Gerodontology. 29(2012) 308-311.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00636.x

Google Scholar

[10] L. Joska, J. Fojt, The effect of porosity on barrier properties of DLC layers for dental implants. Applied Surface Science. 262 (2012) 234-239.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.013

Google Scholar