Load Bearing and Mass Relation Contrast between Composite Shell and Alloy Shell

Article Preview

Abstract:

To improve work efficiency of cabin and solve the contradiction between load bearing and mass, combining parametric modeling and optimization theory,the influence curves of load bearing on mass are proposed. Applying stress state theory, combining distortion energy theory criterion and Tsai-Wu failure criterion, shells load bearing is theoretically analysed. Contrast results are, in the same load condition, compared with alloy, the weight of composite reduces 46.2%;in the same weight condition, the load bearing of composite increases 75%. At present, the cabin load bearing is 0.04MPa, to improve work efficiency, increasing to 0.055MPa and replacing alloy by composite, the load bearing increases 37.5%, while the weight reduces 26.1%, then the contradiction between work efficiency and mass is coordinated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

217-220

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Senthil Murugan, Erick Saavedra Flores. Optimal design of variable fiber spacing composites for aircraft skins. Composite Structures Vol. 94 (2012), p.626~633

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.023

Google Scholar

[2] Feng Jun. modern aircraft structure composite material technology application, aviation manufacturing technology Vol. 17 (2009), p.101~102

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang Yankao. structural optimization design of composite material cabin. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University Vol. 45 (2002), p.1048~1050

Google Scholar

[4] M.C. Simmons, G.K. Schleyer. Pressure loading of aircraft structural panels. Thin-Walled Structures Vol. 44 (2006), p.496 ~506

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2006.05.002

Google Scholar

[5] S.J. Lewis. The use of carbon fibre composites on military aircraft. Composites Manufacturing Vol. 15 (2004), p.95~103

DOI: 10.1016/0956-7143(94)90060-4

Google Scholar