Performance Simulation Comparison of Five-Plunger-Type and Three-Plunger-Type Straw Fuel Forming Machine

Feng Hui Wang; Bei Yi Ma; Xue Jun Bu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.712-715.1424

Paper Titles

Transmission Ratio Optimization of Large Bus with Optimization Goal Normalization Processed
p.1406

Asymmetric Sinusoidal Motion Effect on Aerodynamics of a Plunging Airfoil
p.1410

Vibration Analysis of Complicated Rotor-Bearing System by Beam Element and Strain Energy Method
p.1414

Kinematics Analysis and Simulation of Main Components of Beam Pumping Unit Based on MATLAB
p.1420

Performance Simulation Comparison of Five-Plunger-Type and Three-Plunger-Type Straw Fuel Forming Machine
p.1424

Design and Testing of a Scroll Pump Efficiency
p.1428

Review on the Dynamics of High-Speed Motorized Spindle System
p.1435

Mode Analysis of Lattice Main Boom for Crawler Crane Based on ANSYS_WORKBENCH
p.1439

The Application Research of the Hydraulic Breaking Hammer
p.1444

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 712-715Performance Simulation Comparison of...

Performance Simulation Comparison of Five-Plunger-Type and Three-Plunger-Type Straw Fuel Forming Machine

Abstract:

Straw fuel is a renewable organic fuels which has good combustive, its substitutable action of the raw coal meets the national strategic goals of sustainable development demand. Design proposal that is five-plunger-type straw fuel forming machine has been put forward according to three-plunger-type straw fuel forming machine which had been succeed in developing, its main purpose can meet the rapid growth of market demand for straw fuel, overcome disadvantage of three-plunger-type straw fuel forming machine which have not much higher productivity, give play to produce straw fuel advantages of compact structure, high combustion efficiency, and maximize favourable factors and minimize unfavourable ones. feasibility analysis for five-plunger-type straw fuel forming machine mainly revolves around several areas to unfold including productivity effect, design optimization and stability of motions and so on. Analysis results can be directly certified the project's necessity and economic value.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Manufacturing Science and Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 712-715)

Pages:

1424-1427

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.712-715.1424

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2013

Authors:

Feng Hui Wang*, Bei Yi Ma, Xue Jun Bu

Keywords:

Five-Plunger-Type, Performance Comparison, Performance Simulation, Three-Plunger-Type

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Liu Guohua. Biomass Forming Fuel Technology and Its Application Prospect. Application of Energy Technologies, 2011,41(1):45-47. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Cui Changlong, Wang Wei, Zhang Nan. Straw Solidify Technology and Its Development Analysis. Application of Energy Technologies,2010(6): 53-55. (In Chinese) Reference to a book:

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang Bailiang. Rural Energy Project. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1999. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Liu Guoliang. SolidWork 2006 Completely Self-learning Manuals. Beijing: Science Press, 2006. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang Jinxi, Guo XueQin. SolidWorks and COSMOSMotion Machinery Simulation Design. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2007. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar