Optimization of Ultrasonic Imaging Using Persistence and Filter Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

B-mode ultrasonic images are often pervaded by the electronics noise and speckle artifact, which may make the interpretation of medical images difficult. In this paper, a legible method for ultrasonic image is constructed and it can be effective to suppress the noise and improve the images quality. Dynamic persistence technology based on temporal multi-frames is utilized to smooth the electronics noise and even lower speckle artifact. To reduce computing complexity, a sum table method and conjugate direction search approaches are applied to speed up estimation of motion vector. The guided image filter strategy is used to enhance the contrast and detail resolution for the processed image by persistence. Experimental results show that the proposed method is effective to smooth noise and enhance contrast of ultrasound image in vivo.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

542-547

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Ping, Spatial compounding in 3D imaging of limbs, Ultrasonics Imaging, 19: 251–265, 1997.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Liu and D. C. Liu, Directive Filtering Schemes for Frequency Compounding in Ultrasound Speckle Reduction, in Proc. International Pre-Olympic Congress on Computer Science: 227–231, 2008.

Google Scholar

[3] J.W. Luo and Elisa E. Konofagou, A Fast Normalized Cross-Correlation Calculation Method for Motion Estimation, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 57(6), 1347–1357, 2010.

DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2010.1554

Google Scholar

[4] F. Viola, W. f. Walker, A comparison of the performance of time-delay estimators in medical ultrasound, IEEE Trans. Ultra-son. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 50(4): 392–401, 2003.

DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2003.1197962

Google Scholar

[5] S. Langeland, J. D'hooge, H. Torp, et al, comparison of time-domain displacement estimators for two-dimensional RF tracking, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 29(8): 1177–1186, 2003.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)00972-4

Google Scholar

[6] M.G. Strintzis, I. Kokkinidis, Maximum likelihood motion estimation in ultrasound image sequences, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 4(6): 156-157, 1997.

DOI: 10.1109/97.586034

Google Scholar

[7] A. Basarab and P. Gueth, H. Liebgott, and P. Delachartre, Phase-based block matching applied to motionestimation with unconventional beamforming strategies, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 56(5): 945 – 957, 2009.

DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2009.1127

Google Scholar

[8] Y. G. Zhou and Y. P. Zheng, A motion estimation refinement framework for real-time tissue axial strain estimation with freehandultrasound, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 57(9): 1943–1951, 2010.

DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2010.1642

Google Scholar

[9] G. Wang and D.C. Liu, Adaptive persistence utilizing motion compensation for ultrasound images, IEEE 18th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, vol. 3, : 726-729, 2006.

DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2006.221

Google Scholar

[10] X.Y. Li, Dong C. Liu, Dynamic persistence of ultrasound images after local tissue motion tracking, IEEE 3rd Int. Conf. on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering: 1–4, 2009.

DOI: 10.1109/icbbe.2009.5162670

Google Scholar

[11] K. He, J. Sun, and X. Tang, Guided image filtering, accepted by IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012.

Google Scholar