Application of Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (LFNMR) in Characterizing Coal Pores and Permeability

Article Preview

Abstract:

Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LFNMR) is a rapid, nondestructive analytical method which has been proved to be attractive for its application in brittle and easily compressed coals. In this paper, the relationships between NMR parameters and coal pores were analyzed by the NMR measurements of six coal samples with different ranks using AniMR with the resonance frequency of 12.15MHz. Results show that NMR porosity usually compare well to water porosity and be lower than He porosity, and the NMR porosity at echo spacing of 0.3ms sometimes underestimates the coal sample, lower than water porosity by >1 porosity unit. In contrast, the NMR porosity at echo spacing of 0.1ms is acceptable for characterization of coal reservoir. The difference of NMR porosity at different echo spacing may relate to the vitrinite content. Based on the T2c model, the transverse surface relaxivity of coal is calculated and it ranges from 0.25 to 20 um/s, commonly lower than 5um/s. The producible porosity could be a parameter used to estimate coal permeability, however there still needs a lot of work to construct a perfect method for this.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 718-720)

Pages:

1012-1017

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.B. Yao, D.M. Liu, Y.D. Cai and J.Q Li, Advanced characterization of pores and fractures in coals by nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray computed tomography, J. SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences. 53 (2010) 854-862.

DOI: 10.1007/s11430-010-0057-4

Google Scholar

[2] Y.B. Yao, D.M. Liu, Y. Che, D.Z. Tang, S.H. Tang and W.H Huang, Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), J. Fuel. 89 (2010) 1317-1380.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.11.005

Google Scholar

[3] Y.B. Yao, D.M. Liu, Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals, J. Fuel 95 (2012) 152-158.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.039

Google Scholar

[4] Z.H. Chen, Y.B. Wang, Y.P. Zhang, X.H. Wang and J.S Yang, New research approach of CBM reservoir, J. Proceedings of 2008 Coalbed Methane Symposium, Geological Publishing House (2008) 230-237.

Google Scholar

[5] Z.M. Yang, B.A. Xian, H.Q. Jiang, The experimental study on coalbed gas reservoir using nuclear magnetic resonance technique, J. China Coalbed Methane. 6 (2009) 20-23.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Guo, K. mannharat, A. Kantas, Characterizing moisture and gas content of coal by low-field NMR, J. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 46 (2007) 49-54.

DOI: 10.2118/07-10-05

Google Scholar

[7] S. Li, D.Z. Tang, H. Xu and Z. Yang, Advanced characterization of physical properties of coals with different coal structures by nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray computed tomography, J. Computers & Geosciences. 48 (2012) 220-227.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.01.004

Google Scholar

[8] R.H. Xie, L.Z. Xiao, Z.D. Wang and K.J. Dunn, The influence factors of NMR logging porosity in complex fluid reservoir, J. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences. 51 (2008) 212-217.

DOI: 10.1007/s11430-008-6002-0

Google Scholar

[9] Y.B. Yao, Advanced Reservoir Quantitative characterization and comprehensive evaluation model of coalbed methane reservoirs. PhD Thesis, China University of Geosciences (2012).

Google Scholar

[10] G.R. Coates, L.Z. Xiao, M.G. Prammer, NMR logging principles and applications, Halliburton Energy Services, Houston, 1999.

Google Scholar

[11] D. Marschall, J.S. Gardner, D. Mardon and G.R. Coates, Method for correlating NMR relaxometry and mercury injection data, J. paper 9511 presented at the proceedings of the 1995 International Symposium of Society of core Analysts.

Google Scholar

[12] R.L. Kleinberg, Utility of NMR T2 distributions, connection with capillary pressure, clay effect, and determination of the surface relaxivity parameter ρ2, J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 14 (1996) 761-767.

DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(96)00161-0

Google Scholar