Effect of Processing Parameters on Porosity and Bonding Strength in Supersonic Particles Deposition of Al-Si Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Effect of Supersonic Particles Deposition processing parameters on porosity and bonding strength of Al-Si coating on the surface of ZM5 Magnesium alloy was studied. The result shows that the porosity rates of Al-Si coating are all below 0.6% and the bonding strength is all above 35MPa. With air pressure increasing, the porosity of Al-Si coating reduces to below 0.3% and the bonding strength increases to above 40MPa. With spray distance increasing, the average percent voids of Al-Si coating tends to increase and the bonding strength is better between 160mm and 200mm. The minimum porosity and the maximal bonding strength of the coating can be reached when the speed of feeding powders is at 6r/s.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

332-336

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ZHU Sheng, ZHANG Xiao, Tribological Characteristics of Al-Si Alloy Coating by Supersonic Particles Deposition. 20th Congress of International Federation for Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering. 23-25 (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] BAO Zebin, Study on Cold-sprayed Copper Coating's Properties and Optimizing Parameters for the Spraying Process, Liao Ning Technical University. 51.

Google Scholar

[3] Saden H. Zahiri, Darren Fraser, et al, Effect of Processing Conditions on Porosity Formation in Cold Gas Dynamic Spraying of Copper, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology. 3,15(2006) 422-429.

DOI: 10.1361/105996306x124437

Google Scholar

[4] BU Hengyong, LU Yong, The Numerical Models of Working Gas and Particles in Cold Spray Process, Materials Reviews. 5,25(2011) 112-115.

Google Scholar

[5] Gyuyeol Bae, Yuming Xiong, S. Kumar, et al, General Aspects of Interface Bonding in Kinetic Sprayed Coatings, Acta Materialia. 56 (2008) 4858-4868.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.003

Google Scholar