A Comparison between Effects of Linear and Non-Linear Mechanistic Behaviour of Materials on the Layered Flexible Pavement Response

Article Preview

Abstract:

Modelling granular pavement materials has a significant role in the pavement design procedure. Modelling can be through an experimental or numerical approach to predict the granular behaviour during cyclic loading. The current design process in Australia is based on linear elastic analysis of layers. The analysis is performed through a well-known program CIRCLY which is applied to model bound pavement material behaviour. The KENLAYER is one of the common pavement software models used for pavement design in the United States which performs non-linear analysis for granular materials. Alternatively, a general Finite Element program such as ABAQUS can be used to model the complicated behaviour of multilayer granular materials. This study is to compare results of numerical modelling with these three programs on two sample pavement models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

12-21

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Huang, Y.H., Pavement analysis and design1993: Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA.

Google Scholar

[2] Huang, Y.H., Pavement analysis and design2004: Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Inc., USA.

Google Scholar

[3] Gedafa, D.S., Comparison of Flexible Pavement Performance Using Kenlayer and HDM-4. Midwest Transportation Consortium, Ames, Iowa, 2006.

Google Scholar

[4] Wardle, L., Program CIRCLY: A Computer Program for the Analysis of Multiple Complex Circular Loads on Layered Anisotropic Media. User's Manual1977: Division of Applied Geomechanics, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization Australia.

Google Scholar

[5] Bodhinayake, B.C., A study on nonlinear behaviour of subgrades under cyclic loading for the development of a design chart for flexible pavements. University of Wollongong Thesis Collection, 2008: p.868.

Google Scholar

[6] Ullidtz, P. Analytical tools for design of flexible pavements. in Keynote Address. In: Proceedings if the 9th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, . 2002. Copenhagen, .

Google Scholar

[7] Wardle, L., G. Youdale, and B. Rodway. Current issues for mechanistic pavement design. in 21st ARRB and 11th REAAA Conference, . 2003. Cairns, Australia, : ARRB Transport Research.

Google Scholar

[8] Hadi, M. and M. Symons, Computing stresses in road pavements using CIRCLY, MSC/NASTRAN and STRAND6. Transactions of the Institution of Engineers, Australia. Civil engineering, 1996. 38(2-4): pp.89-93.

Google Scholar

[9] Tutumluer, E., D.N. Little, and S.H. Kim, Validated model for predicting field performance of aggregate base courses. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003. 1837(-1): pp.41-49.

DOI: 10.3141/1837-05

Google Scholar

[10] Zaghloul, S. and T. White, Use of a three-dimensional, dynamic finite element program for analysis of flexible pavement. Transportation Research Record, 1993(1388): pp.60-69.

Google Scholar

[11] Mallela, J. and K. George, Three-dimensional dynamic response model for rigid pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1994(1448).

Google Scholar

[12] Uddin, W., D. Zhang, and F. Fernandez, Finite element simulation of pavement discontinuities and dynamic load response. Transportation Research Record, 1994(1448).

Google Scholar

[13] Cho, Y.H., B.F. McCullough, and J. Weissmann, Considerations on finite-element method application in pavement structural analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1996. 1539(-1): pp.96-101.

DOI: 10.1177/0361198196153900113

Google Scholar

[14] Kim, M. and E. Tutumluer. Modeling Nonlinear, Stress‐Dependent Pavement Foundation Behavior Using a General‐Purpose Finite Element Program. 2006. ASCE.

DOI: 10.1061/40866(198)5

Google Scholar

[15] Kim, M., Three-dimensional finite element analysis of flexible pavements considering nonlinear pavement foundation behavior, 2007, University of Illinois.

Google Scholar

[16] Kim, M., E. Tutumluer, and J. Kwon, Nonlinear pavement foundation modeling for three-dimensional finite-element analysis of flexible pavements. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2009. 9: p.195.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1532-3641(2009)9:5(195)

Google Scholar

[17] Vuong, B.T., Validation of a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model for predicting response and performance of granular pavements with thin bituminous surfaces under heavy vehicles. Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 2008. 17(1): p.3.

Google Scholar

[18] Duncan, J.M., C.L. Monismith, and E.L. Wilson, Finite element analyses of pavements. Highway Research Record Highway Research Board, Washington D. C., 1968. 228: pp.18-33.

Google Scholar

[19] Huang, Y. Finite element analysis of nonlinear soil media. in Proceedings,Symposium on Application of Finite Element Methods in Civil Engineering, . 1969. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, The Netherlands.

Google Scholar

[20] AUSTROADS, Pavement Design - A Guide to the Structural Design of Road Pavements2004: Austroads, Sydney, Australia.

Google Scholar

[21] Yu, H.S., Plasticity and geotechnics. Vol. 13. 2006: Springer.

Google Scholar

[22] Uzan, J., Characterization of granular material. Transportation Research Record, 1985(1022).

Google Scholar

[23] Tutumluer, E., Predicting behavior of flexible pavements with granular bases, 1995.

Google Scholar

[24] Rowshanzamir, M.A., Resilient Cross-anisotropic Behaviour of Granular Base Materials Under Repetitive Loading, 1997, University of New South Wales: Sidney

Google Scholar

[25] Jooste, F.J. and E. Fernando, Development of a procedure for the structural evaluation of superheavy load routes, 1995.

Google Scholar

[26] Thompson, M.R. and Q.L. Robnett, Resilient properties of subgrade soils. Transportation Engineering Journal, 1979. 105(1): pp.71-89.

DOI: 10.1061/tpejan.0000772

Google Scholar